Skip to content

Evaluation of fluoride released from persica chewing gum compared to sodium fluoride chewing gum

Comparison of the effect of Persica chewing gum versus sodium fluoride chewing gum on salivary fluoride concentration in 20-30 years old dental students of Isfahan University

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2012091810872N1
Enrollment
44
Registered
2012-12-26
Start date
2012-11-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The mean of saliva fluoride concentration following using persica chewing gum. Dental examination

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: chewing Persica, 750 mg gum, once, 5 minutes. Intervention 2: Control group: chewing sodium fluoride, 750 mg gum, once, 5 minutes.
Prevention
Intervention group: chewing Persica, 750 mg gum, once, 5 minutes
Control group: chewing sodium fluoride, 750 mg gum, once, 5 minutes

Sponsors

Vice chancellor for research of Dental College of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: 20-30 year- old dental students who are systematically healthy; good oral hygiene; Normal salivary flow rate; Using no medication; Using no systemic or local fluoride supplements (except tooth paste); Not smoking exclusion criteria: Any repeort of systemic/oral diseases during studying phases; Excessive tea drinking; Using medication; Using Persica / fluoride mouthwashes; Smoking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Salivary Fluoride ion. Timepoint: Before intervention, 5, 10, 20, 45 min after intervention. Method of measurement: Mean fluoride ion released in terms of ppm and with laboratory analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Stimulated salivary flow rate. Timepoint: Before intervention, 5, 10, 20, 45 min after intervention. Method of measurement: Mean Stimulated salivary flow rate in terms of ml/min with laboratory analyze.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDoctor Shiva Mortazavi

Ddental college of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

sh_mortazavi@dnt.mui.ac.ir+998 3117922891

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026