Skip to content

Comparison of the efficacy of midazolam nasal spray compared to intranasal midazolam ampoules as part of the pre-operative sedation regimen in children undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia surgery

Comparison of the efficacy of midazolam nasal spray compared to intranasal midazolam ampoules as part of the pre-operative sedation regimen in children undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia surgery , an open-label randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20120731010453N6
Enrollment
60
Registered
2024-12-15
Start date
2024-11-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unilateral inguinal hernia. Unilateral inguinal hernia, without obstruction or gangrene

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Midazolam is administered as a nasal spray at a dose of 0.2-0.3 mg per kilogram. Intervention 2: Control group: The ampoule form of midazolam is administered intran

Sponsors

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
1 Years to 8 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All children between 1 year and 8 years of age who require intranasal midazolam as sedation prior to unilateral inguinal hernia surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Child with a history of seizures Child with a history of trauma to the head and neck area Drug allergy Parental disapproval

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Sedation level. Timepoint: Up to 30 minutes after drug administration. Method of measurement: Ramsey sedation scale.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMojtaba Shafiekhani

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

mojtabashafiekhani@gmail.com+98 71 3242 4255

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026