Skip to content

Comparison of Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Comparison of Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Shariati hospital between 2012 to 2014: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT201206072982N10
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-09-04
Start date
2012-03-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Calculus of gallbladder without cholecystitis. Any condition listed in K80.5 with cholangitis

Interventions

Intervention 1: In the MLC group, a 10- millimeter port was placed in the lower area of the navel, a 2.7- millimeter port was placed in the epigastric region, a 2.7-millimeter port was placed 2 centim
Treatment - Surgery
In the MLC group, a 10- millimeter port was placed in the lower area of the navel, a 2.7- millimeter port was placed in the epigastric region, a 2.7-millimeter port was placed 2 centimeters below the
In the SLIC Group: the main port was placed in the lower area of the navel, and the graspers and camera was entered through same port and cholecystectomy was performed. Then, the gallbladder was taken

Sponsors

Vice Chancellor for Research of Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria: patients being admitted in Tehran Shariati Hospital with symptomatic cholelithiasis who are candidates of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Exclusion criteria: ages more than 60; having Common Bile Duct stone, obesity (BMI equal or more than 40), acute cholelithiasis, and previous surgeries in the upper abdominal areas.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of durgery. Timepoint: from the time the skin was cut until the time it was closed. Method of measurement: recorded by surgeon.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain after surgery. Timepoint: 8, 16, and 24 hours after surgery. Method of measurement: measuring levels of pain using visual analog scale(VAS).;Nausea and vomiting after surgery. Timepoint: in the first 24 hours after surgery. Method of measurement: subjective, recorded by observer from the questionnaire.;Intraoperative complications. Timepoint: at the end of operation. Method of measurement: recorded by surgeon.;Medical complications after surgery: hypertension, ischemia or cardiac arrhythmia. Timepoint: at the time of discharge. Method of measurement: based on medical chart.;Hernia at the site of incisions. Timepoint: 12 months after after surgery. Method of measurement: clinical exam and imagings.;Wound infection. Timepoint: up to 1 month after surgery. Method of measurement: office visits and medical charts.;Postoperative narcotic usage for pain control. Timepoint: up to 48 hours after surgery. Method of measurement: recorded by nurse in the questionnaire.;Total Length of wounds. Timepoint: at the end of operation. Method of measurement: ruler with one millimeter percision.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Zhamak Khorgami

Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Shariati Hospital

khorgami@tums.ac.ir+98 21 8490 2450

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026