Skip to content

Comparing the anesthetic effect of topical amitriptyline jell 2% versus topical lidocaine jell 2% in patients with isolated limb wounds needing primary repair with suture

Comparing the anesthetic effect of topical amitriptyline jell 2% versus topical lidocaine jell 2% in patients with isolated limb wounds needing primary repair with suture: a randomized clinical trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20120215009014N216
Enrollment
90
Registered
2018-03-20
Start date
2018-03-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Isolated limb wounds. Open wound of knee and lower leg

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Topical amitriptyline 2% with amount of 2 mg/kg single dose. Intervention 2: Control group: Topical lidocaine 2% with amount of 2 mg/kg single dose.

Sponsors

Hamedan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age of 18 to 60 years Having isolated limb wounds needing primary repair with suture

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Using monoamine oxidase inhibitors Cardiovascular diseases Arterial active bleeding Unstable vital signs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Assessing the pain. Timepoint: Before suture and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 minutes after suture. Method of measurement: Using VAS.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Farnoosh Jalilvand

Hamedan University of Medical Sciences

hila_kool@hotmail.com+98 81 3364 0030

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026