Skip to content

Comparison of immobilization with long back board to vacuum mattress splint

Comparison of immobilization with long back board to vacuum mattress splint for trauma victims by Tehran EMS in 1390

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT201112278543N1
Enrollment
60
Registered
2012-07-19
Start date
2012-02-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

multiple trauma. Injuries involving multiple body regions

Interventions

Intervention 1: full body immobilization with LBB. Intervention 2: full body immobilization with VMS.
Prevention
full body immobilization with LBB
full body immobilization with VMS

Sponsors

TUMS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria:All trauma patients in whom full body immobilization is indicated. Exclusion criteria: altered mental status; need to airway management or respiratory support; hemodinamic instability; suspected pelvic instability (unstable pelvis in exam); neurological deficit

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Immobilization. Timepoint: after application. Method of measurement: Likert score by the patient.;Application comfort. Timepoint: after application. Method of measurement: Likert score by EMS thechnisian.;Patient comfort. Timepoint: after application. Method of measurement: likert score by trauma patients.;Rate of application. Timepoint: from the beginning to the end of application. Method of measurement: time recording with chronometer by the supervisor.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAlireza Yari

TUMS

aliyara55@yahoo.com+98 21 6652 5327

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026