The efficacy of the Glidescope plud direct laryngoscopy in comparison with direct laryngoscopy in the education of conventional tracheal intubation for medical students

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201112093915N3

Enrollment

Registered

2011-12-17

Start date

2012-01-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation. other medical peocedures

Interventions

Intervention 1: In group M , education of tracheal intubation with direct layngoscopy and Macintash laryngoscope. Intervention 2: In group G, education of intubation with Glidescope videolaryngoscope

In group M , education of tracheal intubation with direct layngoscopy and Macintash laryngoscope

In group G, education of intubation with Glidescope videolaryngoscope in addition to direct laryngoscopy with Machintash laryngoscope

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

21 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: medical students; first experience for intubation education. Exclusion criteria:guest medical students of other universities; prior experience for intubation education

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Success rate of tracheal intubation. Timepoint: End of training course. Method of measurement: Assessment of successful intubation.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Students satisfaction. Timepoint: End of training course. Method of measurement: Questionaire.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAli Peirovifar

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

peirovifara@yahoo.com+98 41133470547

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026