Skip to content

Comparison of two methods of feedback delivery in clinical education

Oral versus written feedback delivery to nursing students in clinical education

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT201111128076N1
Enrollment
47
Registered
2011-12-11
Start date
2011-03-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Education. Persons encountering health services in other specified circumstances

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Students who recieved written feedback dominantly as a modified method in clinical education, at least once a day as soon as possible during the instruction period
Intervention group: Students who recieved written feedback dominantly as a modified method in clinical education, at least once a day as soon as possible during the instruction period (9 days) with t
Control group: Students who recieved oral feedback dominantly as a routin method in clinical education, at least once a day as soon as possible during the instruction period (9 days) with their instr

Sponsors

Northern Khorasan University Of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Students: last semester Educators: interested in the study; at least one year of clinical education experience; M.s license. Exclusion criteria: Students: student absence Educators: interrupted instruction for any reason

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Feedback quality score. Timepoint: After intervention. Method of measurement: Researcher made questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Feedback satisfaction mean score. Timepoint: End of intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.;Feedback session time. Timepoint: Daily and after feedback. Method of measurement: Documentation of time in the checklist.;Average number of student objections. Timepoint: Daily. Method of measurement: Documentation in the checklist.;Average number of oral feedback sessions asked for. Timepoint: After intervention. Method of measurement: Documentation in the checklist.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactVida Tayebi

Northern Khorasan University Of Medical Sciences

vi_tay@nkums.ac.ir vi_tay@yahoo.com+98 58 4225 4808

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026