Effect of Arnebia euchorma on post Fractional Laser wound healing

A comparison of wound healing between Arnebia euchroma ointment (a herbal drug) and Vaseline after laser resurfacing in bilateral face acne scar patients

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201109067499N1

Enrollment

Registered

2013-01-10

Start date

2012-07-10

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burn. Burn of second degree of head and neck

Interventions

Intervention 1: In intervention group, subjects apply Arnebia euchroma ointment 4 times daily and clinical assessment of recovery (erythema, edema, crusts, and erosions) are assessed using 0 to 3 poin

Treatment - Drugs

In intervention group, subjects apply Arnebia euchroma ointment 4 times daily and clinical assessment of recovery (erythema, edema, crusts, and erosions) are assessed using 0 to 3 point visual scoring

In control group, subjects apply Vaselin 4 times daily and clinical assessment of recovery (erythema, edema, crusts, and erosions) are assessed using 0 to 3 point visual scoring systems and digital ph

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Men and women aged 20 to 65 years with bilateral facial acne scar which treat by Laser fractional co2 and have burning after Laser. Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women; Isotretinoin user; use of topical drugs simultaneously

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Wound healing. Timepoint: Post procedure and days 2 , 4 , 7. Method of measurement: Visual scoring systems ( 0=none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe) and digital photographs are taken.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Pruritus. Timepoint: Days 2 , 4. Method of measurement: Visual scoring systems ( 0=none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).;Edema. Timepoint: Days 2 , 4. Method of measurement: Visual scoring systems ( 0=none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).;Dryness. Timepoint: Days 2 , 4. Method of measurement: Visual scoring systems ( 0=none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).;Acne. Timepoint: Days 2 , 4. Method of measurement: Visual scoring systems ( 0=none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).;Erythema. Timepoint: Days 2 , 4. Method of measurement: Visual scoring systems ( 0=none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).	—

Measure

Time frame

Pruritus. Timepoint: Days 2 , 4. Method of measurement: Visual scoring systems ( 0=none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).;Edema. Timepoint: Days 2 , 4. Method of measurement: Visual scoring systems ( 0=none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).;Dryness. Timepoint: Days 2 , 4. Method of measurement: Visual scoring systems ( 0=none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).;Acne. Timepoint: Days 2 , 4. Method of measurement: Visual scoring systems ( 0=none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).;Erythema. Timepoint: Days 2 , 4. Method of measurement: Visual scoring systems ( 0=none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe).

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactJale Aliaslmamghany

Iranian Traditional Medicine Group of medical faculty of Shahed university

aliasl@shahed.ac.ir , jaliasl@yahoo.com+98 21 8896 3849

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026