The effect of probing without irrigation

Evaluation of efficacy of nasolacrimal duct obstruction by probing without irrigation in chideren under 3 years old

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201108227219N3

Enrollment

200

Registered

2011-12-24

Start date

2009-08-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction. Epiphora

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention Group : probing without irrigation , without Intra Venuse Line under short general unesthesia . Intervention 2: Control Group : Probing with irrigation under General Unest

Treatment - Surgery

Intervention Group : probing without irrigation , without Intra Venuse Line under short general unesthesia .

Control Group : Probing with irrigation under General Unesthesia with Intra Venuse Line.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

1 Years to 3 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: inclusion criteria :The main eligibility criteria were epiphora, increased tear meniscus, mucopurulent discharge. The fluorscein dye disappearance test was used to confirm the diagnosis. exclusion criteria : the patients who have history of failed probing .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Chronic Dacryocytitis. Timepoint: Befor Operation, One and Three months after operation. Method of measurement: mucopurulent Discharge`s Signe.	—

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Epiphora. Timepoint: Before operation ,one and three Months after operation. Method of measurement: Tear meniscus measurment.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public Contact?Saleh Hamzeh

Kerman University of Medical Sciences

Sh_karbassi@yahoo.com+98 936 642 8868

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026