Skip to content

Enhancing Dental Implants with Your Own Tooth or Bone: A Scientific Comparison

The comparison between autogenous tooth and autogenous bone graft for phenotype modification around immediate implants

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20110726007128N11
Enrollment
38
Registered
2025-09-26
Start date
2025-09-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontal disease. Periodontal disease, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: After tooth extraction and site preparation, the implant is placed immediately in the anterior maxilla. The gap between the implant and the buccal socket wall is fi

Sponsors

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults aged = 18 years Systemic condition suitable for oral surgery (ASA I or II) Healthy periodontium in adjacent teeth (no probing depth = 4 mm and no bleeding on probing) indication for immediate implant placement in the anterior region for endodontic or restorative reasons Ability and willingness to attend follow-up visits and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Poor oral hygiene (high Plaque Index or inability to maintain oral hygiene) Active smoking (>10 cigarettes/day or =10 pack-years) Pregnancy or breastfeeding Severe periodontal disease Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 7.0%) History of head and neck radiotherapy Current or past use of bisphosphonates, denosumab, or long-term systemic corticosteroids/immunosuppressants alcohol or substance abuse Systemic or metabolic bone diseases interfering with healing Inadequate bone anatomy to achieve primary implant stability inability or unwillingness to attend follow-up visits Active infection at the extraction site (clinical signs of infection or purulence)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Soft tissue thickness. Timepoint: Baseline (at implant placement)and 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Measured using a size 20 endodontic file with a silicone stop at 1 mm and 3 mm from the line connecting the marginal points of adjacent teeth.;Pink Esthetic Score. Timepoint: 6 months after surgery, after placement of the implant prosthesis. Method of measurement: Assessed visually and scored according to the standard Pink Esthetic Score index.;Implant survival. Timepoint: 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Evaluated clinically by recording implant mobility, infection, or loss.;Buccal bone thickness. Timepoint: Measuring buccal bone thickness at the beginning of the study (before the intervention) and 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Measured using cone-beam computed tomography.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Adileh Shirmohamadi

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

shirmohamadia@tbzmed.ac.ir+98 41 1335 5966

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026