Skip to content

Impact of contract learning on self direct study in nursing student

Comparison of methods to learn the common methods (traditional) on self-directed Learning and satisfaction in Nursing Students in clinical situations

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT201107201788N4
Enrollment
60
Registered
2011-10-21
Start date
2011-09-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

learning.

Interventions

Intervention 1: traditional clinical teaching. Intervention 2: contract learning between teacher and student.
traditional clinical teaching
contract learning between teacher and student

Sponsors

Tehran university of Medical sciences center of nursing care research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion: All students who are enrolled in clinical training course can be studied Exclusion: The guste student will not enrrolled

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Satisfaction of Nursing Student. Timepoint: end of study. Method of measurement: Questionnare.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Self direct study. Timepoint: end of study. Method of measurement: Self direct learning instrument.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactLeili Borimnejad

Tehran university of Medical Sciences

lborimnejad@tums.ac.ir l.borimnejad@gmail.com+98 21 6105 4212

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026