Evaluation of the efficacy of laryngeal mask Airway (LMA) compared to endotracheal tube (ETT) in thoracic and abdominal surgeries for under general anesthesia.

Evaluation of the efficacy of laryngeal mask Airway (LMA) compared to endotracheal tube (ETT) in thoracic and abdominal surgeries general anesthesia.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20110513006465N2

Enrollment

100

Registered

2020-03-14

Start date

2019-03-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thoracic Surgery. Thoracic root disorders, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: LMA masks of suitable size 3, 4 or 5 as recommended by the manufacturer (manufactured by IranFormis) before surgery and once. LMA cuff slowly fills until sound Do

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

25 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ?ASA Physical Status Classification System 1 or 2 Patient satisfaction to participate in the study Age range between 25 and 60 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient dissatisfaction to participate in the study Patients not fasting Latex sensitivity History of colds in the last 10 days

Design outcomes

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Sore Throat. Timepoint: After surgery. Method of measurement: Examination.	—

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Effects on airway after intubation in anesthesia. Timepoint: During surgery and after surgery. Method of measurement: checkup.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSeyed Alireza Seyed Siamdoust

Iran University of Medical Sciences

alirezasiamdoust@gmail.com+98 21 8877 1806

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026