Skip to content

propofol, etomidate or propofol with etomidate which one influences quality of laryngeal mask replacement and hemodynamic stability lesser.

Comparing the effect of three methods for induction of anesthesia (propofol, Etomidate, propofol+Etomidate) on quality of laryngeal mask airway replacement and hemodynamic stability in elective surgeries

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT201101054731N5
Enrollment
90
Registered
2012-01-15
Start date
2011-04-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Condition 1: 1:Heart rate changes due to induction of anesthesia. Condition 2: Blood pressure changes due to induction of aneasthesia. Bradycardia,unspecified Nonspecific low blood-pressure reading

Interventions

Intervention 1: Propofol 2.5mg/kg will be given once to put the patient to sleep for surgery. Intervention 2: Etomidate 0.3mg/kg will be given once to put the patient to sleep for surgery. Interventio
Prevention
Propofol 2.5mg/kg will be given once to put the patient to sleep for surgery
Etomidate 0.3mg/kg will be given once to put the patient to sleep for surgery
Propofol 1mg/kg plus Etomidate 0.2 mg/kg will be given once to put the patient to sleep for surgery

Sponsors

Research vice-chancellor of Tabriz university of medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Adult patients with ASA (American society of Anesthesiologist) class I and II; age between 18-70 years; undergoing surgery with LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway). Exclusion criteria: Pharynx or larynx pathology; mouth opening less than 2cm; bronchial asthma; cardiovascular diseases or mallampati 3-4.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Systolic blood pressure. Timepoint: Before anesthesia,after induction of anesthesia,before insertion of LMA, after insertion LMA and every 1min up to 3min. Method of measurement: non invesive monitoring devices with automatic cuff.;Dyastolic blood pressure. Timepoint: Before anesthesia,after induction of anesthesia,before insertion of LMA, after insertion LMA and every 1min up to 3min. Method of measurement: non invesive monitoring devices with automatic cuff.;Mean arterial pressure. Timepoint: Before anesthesia,after induction of anesthesia,before insertion of LMA, after insertion LMA and every 1min up to 3min. Method of measurement: non invesive monitoring devices with automatic cuff.;Heart rate. Timepoint: Before anesthesia,after induction of anesthesia,before insertion of LMA ,after insertion LMA and every 1min up to 3min. Method of measurement: continuos ECG monitoring.;Oxygen saturation. Timepoint: Before anesthesia,after induction of anesthesia,before insertion of LMA ,after insertion LMA and every 1min up to 3min. Method of measurement: Pulse oxymetry devices.;The apnea time after induction anesthesia until return of the first spotaneos ventilation. Timepoint: Before anesthesia,after induction of anesthesia,before insertion of LMA ,after insertion LMA and every 1min up to 3min. Method of measurement: continuos ECG monitoring.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of laryngeal mask airway replacement. Timepoint: After replacement larygeal mask airway. Method of measurement: Insertion condition were graded in a system modifid from lund and stovener.;Number of attempts for LMA insetion. Timepoint: Number of attempt. Method of measurement: observation.;Quality of airway. Timepoint: After replacement larygeal mask airway. Method of measurement: observation.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactHamzeh Hosseinzadah

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

hosseinz@tbzmed.ac.ir+98 41 1334 7055

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026