Comparison of one vs two implant overdentutres

Evaluation and comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in one- implant retained mandibular overdenture and tow-implant retained mandibular overdenture with immediate functional loading

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Early Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201010265029N1

Enrollment

Registered

2011-01-20

Start date

2010-11-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

bone loss. Other specified disorders of bone density and structure

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: use of two implant in anterior mandible. Intervention 2: Intervention group: use of one implant in anterior mandible.

Rehabilitation

Control group: use of two implant in anterior mandible

Intervention group: use of one implant in anterior mandible

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

25 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: using complete denture with looseness problem Exclusion criteria: uncontrolled diabetes, heavy smoking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Cervical bone loss. Timepoint: Immediately and 1, 3, and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: digital periapical radiography.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Patient's satisfaction. Timepoint: Immediately and 1, 3, and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: VAS.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Fariborz Vafaee

Dental Dental School, Hamadan Medical Science University

fvafaee@umsha.ac.irfvafaee@gmail.com+98 81 1824 1961

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026