low positive affect. -
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: Training Strategy for gratitude increase based on Emmons. Intervention 2: Training Strategy for Seligman gratitude increase based on Dickerhoof, R. M. (2007) that letter are not sent t
Behavior
Training Strategy for gratitude increase based on Emmons
Training Strategy for Seligman gratitude increase based on Dickerhoof, R. M. (2007) that letter are not sent to benefactor.
Training Strategy for gratitude increase based on verbal-action to benefactor, developed by the researcher of current trial
Emmons neutral events strategy that subjects counting neutral events during the intervention. This group is the same as Emmons gratitude strategy without any gratitude order.
Seligman neutral strategy based on training Strategy to Seligman gratitude increase. Dickerhoof (2007) Letter content is not related to gratitude
Neutral verbal-action strategy is the same as verbal-action gratitude strategies, without gratitude orders.
Control
Sponsors
Shahed University
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: low positive affect of average (X=5/47, S= 87/35) in university students who agreed to participate in this research and signed a consent form
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria:
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Positive affect. Timepoint: 15 days. Method of measurement: PANAS questionaire: pasitive and negative scale. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Optimism. Timepoint: 15 days. Method of measurement: Lot questionnaire.;Happiness. Timepoint: 15 days. Method of measurement: Oxford questionnaire. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactZeynab Lashani
Shahed university
Outcome results
None listed