Skip to content

A comparative evaluation of De-epithelialized Gingival Graft versus Sub-epithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Treatment Of Single Gingival Recession Using The Coronally Advanced Flap Technique

A comparative evaluation of De-epithelialized Gingival Graft versus Sub-epithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Treatment Of Single Gingival Recession Using The Coronally Advanced Flap Technique

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20101006004877N30
Enrollment
12
Registered
2022-05-20
Start date
2022-04-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival recession. Gingival recession

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Treatment of single gingival recession by using coronally advanced flap with palatal cannective tissue harvested with de epithelialized free gingival graft method.

Sponsors

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age between 18 to 60 years Non-smoker and systemically healthy, No active periodontal disease Presence of at least two single-rooted teeth with Miller class I and/or II (RT1) buccal gingival recession defects =2 mm in depth Full-mouthplaque and bleeding score of 3 mm, Absence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) and non-detectable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) at the defect sites No history of previous periodontal plastic surgery at the affected sites Minimum 2.5mm thickness of palatal mucosa

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Gingival margin level to cej (recession depth). Timepoint: Baseline , 3 and 6 month after surgery. Method of measurement: Periodontal probe.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Recession width. Timepoint: Baseline , 3 and 6 month after surgery. Method of measurement: Periodontal probe.;Keratinized tissue width. Timepoint: Baseline , 3 and 6 month after surgery. Method of measurement: Periodontal probe.;Clinical attachment level. Timepoint: Baseline , 3 and 6 month after surgery. Method of measurement: Periodontal probe.;Gingival thickness. Timepoint: Baseline , 3 and 6 month after surgery. Method of measurement: Digital caliper and endodontic file.;Probing depth. Timepoint: Baseline , 3 and 6 month after surgery. Method of measurement: Periodontal probe.;Patient satisfaction. Timepoint: 6 Month after surgery. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale.;Pain and discomfort. Timepoint: 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 Days after treatment. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale.;Root Coverage Esthetic Score ( RES ). Timepoint: 6 Month after treatment. Method of measurement: Score of index.;Post operation bleeding. Timepoint: 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 Days after treatment. Method of measurement: Patient two-part response.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactJaber Yaghini

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

J_yaghini@dnt.mui.ac.ir+98 31 3792 5542

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026