Skip to content

Effect of splints on hand function

Comparison of mobilizing and immobilizing splints on hand motor function in stroke patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT201009294836N1
Enrollment
31
Registered
2010-11-28
Start date
2009-05-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke. Stroke, not specified as haemorrhage or infarction

Interventions

Intervention 1: Participants in mobilizing splint group wore a mobilizing splint for eight weeks, five days per week and on average six hours per day. Mobilizing splint placed on the forearm and hand
Rehabilitation
Participants in control group only received traditional rehabilitation including Bobath exercises.
Participants in mobilizing splint group wore a mobilizing splint for eight weeks, five days per week and on average six hours per day. Mobilizing splint placed on the forearm and hand and allowed pati
Participants in immobilizing splint group wore an immobilizing splint for eight weeks, five days per week and on average six hours per day. Immobilizing splint placed on the forearm and hand and did n

Sponsors

Army University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
45 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Hemiplegia in post-stroke patients have occurred more than 12 months before the beginning of the study, having no Botax injection, spasticity score based on modified Ashworth scale>1, no functional movement in involved hand, age between 45 to 75. Exclusion criteria: Presence of non-stroke related problems in involved upper limb, presence of severe cognitive problems.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Motor function. Timepoint: Before the beginning of the study and 8 week after that. Method of measurement: Fugl-Meyer scale, quantitative.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Spasticity. Timepoint: onset of study, 8th week. Method of measurement: modified Ashworth scale.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad Heidari

Army University of Medical Sciences

?hr-heidari@muq.ac.ir; mheidari1364@gmail.com; mheidari83@yahoo.com+98 17 1333 8410

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026