Skip to content

The comparison of Pap smear quality with two different methods

The comparison of Pap smear quality between the method of Anatomical spatula and common method (spatula-cytobrush) in women referred to gynecology clinics

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT201009121548N11
Enrollment
200
Registered
2011-01-16
Start date
2010-01-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pap smear. General examination and investigation of persons without complaint and reported diagnosis

Interventions

Intervention 1: Pap smear with Anatomical spatula. Intervention 2: Pap smear with spatula-cytobrush.
Prevention
Pap smear with Anatomical spatula
Pap smear with spatula-cytobrush

Sponsors

Vice chancellor for research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
20 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: married, not pregnant, not using vaginal cream. Exclusion criteria: Severe cervicitis, severe genital infection, cuitus in two days before sampling.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The present of adequacy of cells and endocervical cells. Timepoint: after sameling. Method of measurement: two pathologist report.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Distribution of cellular infection and inflammations. Timepoint: after sampeling. Method of measurement: two pathologists report.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026