Skip to content

The clinical comparison of two methods for pereventive resin restoration of young permanent teeth

The Clinical comparison of preventive resin restoration retention using Nano-bonding and Etch-&-Rinse Adhesive systems (Conventional method)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20100125003168N4
Enrollment
42
Registered
2017-12-18
Start date
2017-12-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

dental caries. ??????? ??? ?????? ????? ?? ????

Interventions

Intervention 1: intervention group : 1)tooth cleaning2)remove caries3)isolation4)using Nano-bonding (G-premi Bond,GC Corpration,Tokyo,Japan) and cure for 20 seconds5)use of sealant (Clinpro-3M,USA) an
Prevention
Control group: 1)tooth cleaning2)remove caries3)isolation4)using 37% acid etch (Etch Rite , PULPDENT Corporation , USA)for 20 seconds then , Rinse acid for 20 seconds 5)use of bonding ( single bond 2,
intervention group : 1)tooth cleaning2)remove caries3)isolation4)using Nano-bonding (G-premi Bond,GC Corpration,Tokyo,Japan) and cure for 20 seconds5)use of sealant (Clinpro-3M,USA) and cure for 20 se

Sponsors

Reasearch Vice-Chancellor- Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
6 Years to 12 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: group of 6-12 years of age presence of permanent teeth of the first molar in the lower jaw on both sides with minor decay at the occlusal level evidence of oral hygiene at home patient collaboration and acceptance of treatment no therapeutic treatment has been performed on the teeth previously possibility of isolation by cotton roll and suction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: history of medical illness that may interfere with treatment drug affecting the saliva and its quality history of allergy to any of the restorative materials uncooperation patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The retention of restoration. Timepoint: 3 and 6 months. Method of measurement: exploration and observation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The working time. Timepoint: 3 and 6 months. Method of measurement: exploration and observation.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public Contactleila Erfanparast

faculty of dentistry

Erfanparastl@tbzmed.ac.ir+98 41 1335 5965

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026