Skip to content

Effectiveness of virtual reality rehabilitation-based approach compared to balance-specific training and conventional training on balance function of cerebral palsy children: A randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness of virtual reality rehabilitation-based approach compared to balance-specific training and conventional training on balance function of cerebral palsy children: A randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20090301001722N25
Enrollment
36
Registered
2020-07-30
Start date
2020-09-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy. Cerebral palsy

Interventions

Intervention 1: First Intervention Group: Virtual Reality Training: During virtual reality rehabilitation-based therapy period children ,CP children, will play a video game of the X-box One-S using th

Sponsors

Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
4 Years to 12 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Cerebral palsy children diagnosed as spastic monoplegia, hemiplegic and diplegic patients; Children with age between 4 to 12 years old; Children able to walk (Grade I and II according to GMFCS-ER); The degree of spasticity in involved lower extremities according to the Modified Ashworth Scale should be ranged between grade 1 and grade 2. Children able to understand the instructions of the therapist and the games; Children did not receive any surgical intervention or any injection of Botulinum toxin in the last 6 months. No visual, cognitive or auditory impairments that would interfere with gameplay; Regular past use of an AVG system at home (more than 1 hour/week for more than 4 weeks in the past year).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children who refused to continue the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) - Dimensions D and E scores' change. Timepoint: Baseline, after 6 weeks training and 6 weeks follow-up. Method of measurement: Any change in the scores of Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) - Dimensions D and E.;Pediatric balance scale scores. Timepoint: Baseline, after 6 weeks training and 6 weeks follow-up. Method of measurement: Any change in Pediatric balance scale.;5 times sit to stand test. Timepoint: Baseline, after 6 weeks training and 6 weeks follow-up. Method of measurement: StopwatchTime change's in 5 times sit to stand test by chronometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Center of Pressure sway (velocity of displacement, and Standard deviation in medio-lateral and anteroposterior displacement). Timepoint: Baseline, after 6 weeks training and after 6 weeks follow-up. Method of measurement: Stabilometer.;Digital Photography (Displacement of the center of mass, Body alignment, Segments alignment). Timepoint: Baseline, after 6 weeks training and after 6 weeks follow-up. Method of measurement: Nikon COOLPIX L340 camera.

Countries

Lebanon

Contacts

Public ContactHussein Ziab

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

houssein.ziab@gmail.com+961 70 804 130

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026