cystolitholapaxy versus transurethral lithotripsy in treatment of bladder stones

Comparison efficacy of cystolitholapaxy with transurethral lithotripsy in the treatment of bladder stones less than 20 mm in adult patients

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20081011001323N30

Enrollment

Registered

2023-01-29

Start date

2023-01-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder calculus. Urinary calculus, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: In the first group (cystolitholapaxy) after spinal anesthesia, in lithotomy position stone crushing will be done by litholapaxy and stones will be removed by ins

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: presence of bladder stone less than 20 millimeter Adult patients older than 18 years old Having informed consent form for entering study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: presence of coagulopathy pregnancy Active urinary tract infection severe cardiopulmonary disease contraindication to general or regional anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Complete stone removal and crushed particles. Timepoint: During operation and two weeks later. Method of measurement: Observation during operation and ultrasonography two weeks later.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time of operation. Timepoint: During operation. Method of measurement: Recording time from start of operation to transfer of patient to recovery.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSadrollah Mehrabi

Yasouj University of Medical Sciences

sadrollahm@yahoo.com+98 74 3322 1812

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026