the effect of using bonding on fissure sealant success rate. -
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: intervention 2: use of pq1 bonding
no dose. Intervention 2: intervention 1:use of prompt l pop bonding
no dose.
Treatment - Drugs
intervention 2: use of pq1 bonding
no dose
intervention 1:use of prompt l pop bonding
Sponsors
Khorasgan branch Islamic Azad University
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
6 Years to 8 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: inclusion criteria: existing two sound maxillary permanent molar tooth or at least one tooth with remembered characteristics - moderate oral hygiene - no existing systemic disease exclusion criteria:don't have cooperation of patient
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria:
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Success rate of fissure sealant. Timepoint: 3, 6, and 12 month. Method of measurement: Position of fissure sealant (intact, partially failed, completly failed). | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Decay. Timepoint: 3, 6, 12 months. Method of measurement: Oral examination.;Discoloration. Timepoint: 3, 6, 12 months. Method of measurement: Oral examination. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactParvin Khadem
Khorasgan branch of Islamic Azad University
Outcome results
None listed