Comparative evaluation of clinical success of Portland cement and MTA in pemanent molar perforation

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT138902153851N1

Enrollment

Registered

2010-06-04

Start date

2006-11-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

tooth root perforation.

Interventions

Intervention 1: insertion of control perforation matherial(MTA) in site of perforation until it sealed perforation site clinicaly and be visible in radiographic image. Intervention 2: insertion of ex

insertion of control perforation matherial(MTA) in site of perforation until it sealed perforation site clinicaly and be visible in radiographic image

insertion of experimental perforation matherial(portland cement) in site of perforation until it sealed perforation site clinicaly and be visible in radiographic image

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: less than one week passed from perforation occurrence, absence of clinical signs like tooth mobility, swelling, mucosal color changes, periodontal pocket and fistula, absence of radio-graphic changes in site of perforation, restorability of tooth after endodontic treatment, absence of systemic disease Exclusion criteria: patients who did not come to clinic for follow up

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Gingival redness in perforation site. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical evaluation.;Gingival swelling in perforation site. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical evaluation.;Bone resorption in perforation site. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Radiographic evaluation.;Tooth mobility. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical evaluation.;Spontaneous pain. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical evaluation.;Precussion sensitivity. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical evaluation.	—

Measure

Time frame

Gingival redness in perforation site. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical evaluation.;Gingival swelling in perforation site. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical evaluation.;Bone resorption in perforation site. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Radiographic evaluation.;Tooth mobility. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical evaluation.;Spontaneous pain. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical evaluation.;Precussion sensitivity. Timepoint: 3 months and 6 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: clinical evaluation.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Mahdi Sedigh Shamsi

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

sedighm@sums.ac.ir+98 71 1628 5274

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026