Skip to content

The clinical comparison of two methods for sealing fissures of young permanent teeth

The clinical comparison of fissure sealant retention using self-etch and etch-rinse systems

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT138811053168N1
Enrollment
80
Registered
2010-04-18
Start date
2008-07-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

clinical evaluation of two fissure sealant therapy methods. dental examination

Interventions

Intervention 1: fissure sealant therapy with: PLP. Intervention 2: fissure sealant therapy with: acid etch and bonding.
Prevention
fissure sealant therapy with: PLP
fissure sealant therapy with: acid etch and bonding

Sponsors

Reasearch Vice-Chancellor- Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
7 Years to 12 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria 1)7-12 years of age,2)presence of two first upper or lower molars without caries, 3)deep groove that indicate fissure sealant therapy,4)satisfaction of parentes. Exclusion Criteria 1) carious molars, 2)if two molars were not in the same jaw

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The retention of sealants. Timepoint: 6 and 12 months. Method of measurement: exploration and observation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The working time. Timepoint: 6 and 12 months. Method of measurement: exploration and observation.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactLeila Erfanparast

Faculty of Dentistry

erfanparastl@tbzmed.com+98 41 1335 5965

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026