Skip to content

Comparison of two manipulative therapy techniques and outcome in patients with sacroiliac joint pain

Comparison of two manipulative therapy techniques and outcome in patients with sacroiliac joint pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT138806102398N1
Enrollment
32
Registered
2011-06-04
Start date
2008-12-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

sacroiliac joint pain. Dislocation of sacroiliac and sacrococcygeal joint

Interventions

Intervention 1: 1.SIJ manipulation: The patient was supine
the therapist stood on opposite side to be manipulated. The patient was passively moved into side bending to be manipulated. The patient interlocked the fingers behind his or her hand. The therapist p
Rehabilitation
1.SIJ manipulation: The patient was supine
2. Lumbar manipulation: The patient lied with the more painful side up (e.g. right). The therapist stood in front of the patient. The therapist then flexed the top leg until the lumbar spine was fle

Sponsors

shiraz university of medical science
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria were: 18-30 years old; Female patients with a history of unilateral or bilateral SIJ pain; Duration of pain between 2 weeks to one year at the time of initial consultation. The exclusion criteria were: destructive lesions of the spine, ribs and pelvis; Cauda equina syndrome; Gross instability; Infection; Pregnancy; Spondylolysis; Osteoporesis and previous back surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual analogue scale (VAS). Timepoint: before, immediately, 48 hours and one month after treatment. Method of measurement: Pain intensity was recorded by using a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS), 0 indicating no pain and 100, the worst pain ever.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Oswestry disability index (ODI) Questionnaire. Timepoint: before treatment, 48 hours and one month after treatment. Method of measurement: Functional disability was recorded by using the Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire (ODI). Each item was scored on a 0-5 scale, and the maximum score was 50.In this study the maximum score was 45 because one item was omitted (sex life). Relative values are reported (total score/total possible score ×100%).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr.Fahimeh Kamali

School Of Rehabilitation, Shiraz University Of Medical Science

fahimehkamali@hotmail.com+98 71 1627 1551

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026