Skip to content

Is local injection of mesenchymal stem cells after endoscopic dilation safe and does it improve the outcome of intestinal stricture in patients with Crohn's disease?

Is local injection of mesenchymal stem cells after endoscopic dilation safe and does it improve the outcome of intestinal stricture in patients with Crohn's disease?

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2022-003833-21-BE
Enrollment
50
Registered
2023-01-30
Start date
2023-04-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn's disease patients with symptomatic intestinal stricture eligible to endoscopic dilatation

Interventions

Product Name: Mesenchymal Stem Cells Product Code: MSC Pharmaceutical Form: Suspension for injection Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Suspension for injection Route of administration of the placebo

Sponsors

CHU of Liège
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patient aged = 18 years with Crohn's Disease diagnosed more than 6 months ago - Background treatment, for Crohn's Disease, stable for 4 months - Presence of stricture (whether de novo or anastomotic), meeting the radiological definition of stenosis, i.e. a combination of the following criteria: (1) localized luminal narrowing (reduction of luminal diameter by at least less than 50% compared to adjacent healthy bowel segment), (2) bowel wall thickening (25% increase in wall thickness compared to adjacent unaffected bowel) and pre-stenotic dilation (luminal diameter greater than 3 cm) - Presence of symptomatic stricture with abdominal pain after meals and limitations on the amount or type of food at screening - Presence of a stenosis accessible by ileo-colonoscopy, not passable (i.e. not allowing the passage of the adult ileo-colonoscope), of a length less than 5 cm, eligible for endoscopic dilation - Patient accepting the study protocol and having signed an informed consent - Patient capable of undergoing entero-MRI Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 45 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patient liable for immediate surgery - Patient with intra-abdominal fistula or abscess - Patient with a stenosis not accessible to ileocolonoscopy - Patient presenting = 2 strictures with impossibility of determining which stenosis is "dominant" and responsible for the symptoms (based on dilation in entero-MRI) - Patient with a stenosis longer than 5 cm - Patient with a contraindication to performing an MRE or to the use of contrast product injection in MRE (Gadolinium) - Pregnant woman or planning a pregnancy in the year - Patient with kidney insufficiency (with anuria, GFR or glomerular filtration rate 3 mg/dL) - Patient with documented human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, active hepatitis B or C or tuberculosis - Patient having presented an opportunistic infection in the 6 months preceding inclusion or a serious infection in the previous 3 months - Patient who has developed a malignant tumor with a history of lymphoproliferative disease with the exception of: non-melanoma skin cancer, carcinoma in situ (e.g. skin, cervix, bladder, breast) and in remission for at least 3 years prior to screening, superficial bladder cancer, asymptomatic low-grade or localized curatively treated prostate cancer for which the “watch-and-wait” approach is the standard of care as well as any other cancer that has been in remission for = 3 years prior to enrollment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of local MSCs injection, in association with endoscopic dilation, in strictures of patients with Crohn's disease.;Secondary Objective: - To identify the predictive factors of a clinical response to this combined treatment. - To evaluate the histological modifications of the proteome of the intestinal epithelium, of the adherent intestinal microbiota, the serum/plasma proteomic profile and the blood immunophenotyping, induced by these MSCs, to better understand the specific mechanisms of action of this treatment.;Primary end point(s): A clinical response to the symptomatic stenosis at week 48 associated with either an endoscopic response or a radiological response AND an absence of further endoscopic dilation, surgical management for the stenosis or optimization of drug treatment or use of corticosteroid therapy;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: At Week 48

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): - The favorable evolution of clinical scores (PRO, CDOS, CDAI, SHS and S-PRO) between follow-up visits - The complete or partial endoscopic response of the stricture, assessed by ileo-colonoscopy, at 24 weeks - Improvement of the stenosis, during reassessment by DCE-MRI (lumen size, parietal thickness, pre-stenotic dilation and length of the stricture) between weeks 0, 24 and 48 - The evolution of the CDEIS over time - The evolution of biomarkers (CRP, faecal calprotectin) over time - The time before a symptomatic, endoscopic and radiological clinical relapse - The need for a new intervention (endoscopic dilation, recourse to surgery, introduction of corticosteroid therapy or therapeutic optimization) at week 48.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: At Week 24 and 48

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Public ContactPrincipal Investigator

CHU of Liège

s.vieujean@chuliege.be3243237256

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026