Skip to content

A Multicentric Randomized Double-Blind Phase 3 Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of an Adapted Antibiotherapy in Hurley Stage 2 Active Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients versus Tetracycline Derivative

A Multicentric Randomized Double-Blind Phase 3 Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of an Adapted Antibiotherapy in Hurley Stage 2 Active Hidradenitis Suppurativa Patients versus Tetracycline Derivative - ABCESS2

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2022-003562-20-FR
Enrollment
92
Registered
2022-12-02
Start date
2023-03-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-10-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hidradenitis Suppurativa MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10020041 Term: Hidradenitis suppurativa System Organ Class: 100000004858

Interventions

Trade Name: ROCEPHINE 1 g/3,5 ml pdre/solv p sol inj IM Pharmaceutical Form: Powder and solvent for solution for injection Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Powder and solution for solution for inje

Sponsors

INSTITUT PASTEUR
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults =65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Person < 18 and = 60 years old Former stage 3 HS Previous use of the experimental treatment Unauthorized drugs for the study during the month preceding the inclusion Any contra-indication to study treatments or excipient (e.g. lactose, corn starch, riboflavin notably) pregnancy, breastfeeding, known allergy to experimental or reference drugs, wheat allergy, tendinopathy, QT prolongation, bradycardia, heart failure, heart rhythm disturbances, hydroelectrolytic disorders, hypokalemia, coagulation disorders, severe liver/kidney dysfunction, porphyria, mandatory use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for other medical conditions Unbalanced diabetes (ie HbA1c above 7%) Dysphagia, untreated gastro-oesophageal reflux/ulcer, BMI = 35 Immune suppression, inflammatory disease, including gastroenterologic and rheumatologic inflammatory conditions, Lactase deficiency, lactose and galactose intolerance Malabsorption syndrome Person living in the same household as another patient Person under guardianship or curatorship Individuals with any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives (e.g patient unable to complete DLQI, or poor predictable observance Participation in another interventional research on health products studies Patients requiring repeated (more than 3/year) use of antibiotics for a chronic disease other than HS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To demonstrate the superiority of a 3-week course of a ceftriaxone+metronidazole treatment followed by 3 weeks of a rifampicin+moxifloxacin+metronidazole combination, then 6 weeks of rifampicin+moxifloxacin (experimental treatment) over a 12-week course of tetracycline-derivative (control treatment) in patients with Hurley stage 2 HS (Hidradenitis suppurativa) at week 12. ;Secondary Objective: Efficacy of the experimental treatment: - To measure the clinical efficacy at week 6, week 24 and week 52 - To measure microbiological efficacy at week 12 - To evaluate the impact on pain and quality of life - To quantify the use of additional treatments - To characterize the number of HS flares after clinical remission - To identify prognosis markers of response to treatments Safety of the experimental treatment: - To evaluate clinical and biological tolerance - To identify emergence of multidrug resistance in the gut microflora;Primary end point(s): Percentage of patients reaching clinical remission at week 12, défined by an improvement of 90% of the IHS4 score from the baseline (IHS4 (1));Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Week 12

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Efficacy: - Physician HS evaluation: Physician Global Assessment (PGA), modified Sartorius score, HS clinical Response (HiSCR), International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score (IHS4) at each visit - Normalization of the worst lesion microbiome at W12 compared to baseline at inclusion - Patient’s HS evaluation: Pain (visual analogic scale, number of painful days per month); Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) - Number of pain killers and antibiotic treatments prescribed for flares (acute worsening of one or more HS lesions), number of surgical drainages - Time without flare of HS after remission, number of flares using a patient journal - Identification of prognosis markers of response to treatments: Patient’s personal and familial history, lesions localization and characteristics, clinical examination, Body Mass Index (BMI) Past antimicrobial treatments Microbiome of the worst lesion at baseline Microbiome of relapsing or resistant lesions Observance of the study treatment CRP, CBC, blood glucose Safety: Description of adverse events related to treatments Description of adverse events related to protocol procedures other than treatments Emergence of extended spectrum betalactamase and carbapenemase producing enterobacteriaceae as well as vancomycin resistant enterococci in the gut microflora ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: At weeks 6, 12, 24 and 52

Countries

France

Contacts

Public ContactJOLLY nathalie

CRT-CC

sponsor@pasteur.fr33140613977

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026