Skip to content

A Study of Etrasimod in Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis, Who Have Tried Prior Systemic Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis.

A PHASE 2/3, TWO-PART STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND LONG-TERM SAFETY WITH ORAL ETRASIMOD, 2 MG, ONCE DAILY IN ADULT PARTICIPANTS WITH MODERATE-TO-SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS WITH A HISTORY OF PRIOR SYSTEMIC TREATMENT FAILURE

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2022-003361-37-CZ
Enrollment
400
Registered
2022-12-20
Start date
2023-03-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis with a History of Prior Systemic Treatment Failure MedDRA version: 21.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10003639 Term: Atopic dermatitis System Organ Class: 10040785 - Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders

Interventions

Product Name: etrasimod Product Code: PF-07915503 Pharmaceutical Form: Tablet INN or Proposed INN: etrasimod Current Sponsor code: PF-07915503 Other descriptive name: Etrasimod arginine Concentration

Sponsors

Pfizer Inc.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Chronic AD (also known as atopic eczema) that was diagnosed at least 1 year prior to Screening and meets Hanifin and Rajka criteria at screening). 2.Moderate to severe AD: a.IGA score =3 (on the 0 to 4 IGA scale, in which 3 = moderate and 4 = severe) at screening and baseline (Day 1) b.BSA =10% of AD involvement at screening and baseline (Day 1) c.Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) =16 at screening and baseline (Day 1) 3.A participant who has failed a prior systemic therapy for AD, ie, refractory, moderate-to-severe AD that is not adequately controlled with other systemic drug products, including biologics, or when use of those therapies is inadvisable. (i.e., medical contraindications to systemic therapy prohibit use). a.Inadequate response to = 2 weeks of cyclosporine, azathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, biologic, JAK inhibitors, or systemic corticosteroid (CS; defined as pulse of systemic CS or = 2 weeks of continuous oral CS), or when systemic therapy is inadvisable. - In Part 1, approximately 30% of participants are permitted with a failure of a prior systemic corticosteroid therapy without failing another systemic treatment for AD. For the remaining participants, failure of a prior systemic corticosteroid therapy alone is not sufficient to meet the criterion of prior systemic failure, i.e., the participant must fail another systemic treatment for AD. - In Part 2, failure of systemic corticosteroids may qualify a participant for the study. b.Refractory is an insufficient clinical response defined as the inability to achieve and maintain remission or a low disease activity state of minimal or mild lesions only, within 1 year of screening, despite treatment with systemic therapy for a period sufficient to demonstrate efficacy as determined by the Investigator. c.Acceptable documentation for these criteria includes chart notes that record medication prescription and treatment outcome, or Investigator documentation based on communication with the patient's treating physician. For study purposes, document failure of prior systemic drug(s) to adequately control AD in the CRF. 4.Willing to apply a topical emollient/moisturizer at least once daily for =1 week prior to baseline (Day 1) and willing to maintain consistent (ie, no change in type, frequency, or application) daily application over the course of the study. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 388 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 12

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Presence of potential confounding factors: -Skin conditions (eg, psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis) that may interfere with evaluation of AD or assessment of treatment response as deemed by the Investigator. -Current significant active infection or requiring a treatment for infection that may interfere with the assessment of AD. Study Arms and Duration: Part 1 (DB period and OLE period): -Etrasimod, 2 mg (tablet) QD for 16 weeks or Placebo (tablet) QD for 16 weeks; OLE period: Etrasimod, 2 mg (tablet) QD for 52 weeks. -Up to 76 weeks duration: including up to 4 weeks for screening, 16-week DB treatment period, 52-week OLE treatment period, and a safety follow-up at 2 and 4 weeks after treatment completion. Part 2 (OL period): -Etrasimod, 2 mg (tablet) QD for 52 weeks. -Up to 60 weeks duration: including up to 4 weeks for screening, 52-week OL treatment period, and a safety follow-up at 2 and 4 weeks after treatment completion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: -Part 1 DB: To evaluate the efficacy of etrasimod, 2 mg, QD versus placebo in adult participants with moderate-to-severe AD and a history of a prior systemic therapy failure. -Part 1 OLE and Part 2 (OL): To evaluate the long-term safety of oral etrasimod, 2 mg, QD in adult participants with moderate-to-severe AD and a history of a prior systemic therapy failure.;Secondary Objective: -Part 1 DB: To evaluate the efficacy of etrasimod, 2 mg, QD based on additional measures in adult participants with moderate-to-severe AD and a history of a prior systemic therapy failure. -Part 1 OLE and Part 2: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of oral etrasimod, 2 mg, QD in adult participants with moderate-to-severe AD and a history of a prior systemic therapy failure.;Primary end point(s): - Proportion of participants achieving IGA of clear (0) or almost clear (1) (on a 5-point scale) and a reduction of = 2 points from baseline at Week 16. - Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent AEs, AEs leading to study treatment discontinuation, SAEs, and AESIs. -Incidence of clinically significant changes in clinical laboratory values, ECG measurements and vital signs. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: - At Week 16 - Throughout the study

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): -Proportion of participants achieving a EASI-75 at Week 16. -Percent change from baseline in EASI at Week 16. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 16 weeks

Countries

Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Spain, United States

Contacts

Public ContactClinical Trials.gov Call Centre

Pfizer Inc.

ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com18007181021

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026