Hip osteoarthritis
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: - Age of 18 years or older - Scheduled for total hip replacement surgery under general anaesthesia - Informed consent obtained Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 50 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 50
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: - Insufficient control of the Dutch language to read the patient information and to fill out de questionnaires - Known or suspected hypersensitivity to rocuronium or sugammadex - Deficiency of vitamin K dependent clotting factors or coagulopathy - Severe liver- or renal disease (including patients on dialysis) - Known or suspected neuromuscular disorders impairing neuromuscular function - Women who are or may be pregnant or currently breastfeeding - Chronic use of psychotropic drugs
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Main Objective: The overall objective of this study is to translate the beneficial impact of deep neuromuscular blockade versus moderate neuromuscular blockade on clinical outcomes (i.e. quality-of-recovery and pain), as observed in patients undergoing different types if laparoscopic surgeries to patients undergoing open surgical procedures. Specified the main objective of this study is to assess the potential effect of deep neuromuscular blockade on the quality of recovery after total hip replacement surgery under general anesthesia. ;Secondary Objective: - To establish the relationship between the use of deep neuromuscular blockade versus moderate deep neuromuscular blockade and innate immune function after total hip replacement surgery. - To establish the relationship between the use of deep neuromuscular blockade versus moderate deep neuromuscular blockade and postoperative pain scores and the incidence infectious complications after total hip replacement surgery. ;Primary end point(s): The primary outcome is the quality of recovery at postoperative day 1 measured bij the quality-of-recovery 40 questionnaire ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Postoperative day 1 | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary end point(s): The secondary outcomes of the study are: -Postoperative innate immune function measured by: serum cytokine levels (TNF-a, IL-6 and IL-10) and ex-vivo cytokine production capacity upon whole blood lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation at the end of surgery and at postoperative day 1. - Pain scores (NRS 0-10) and total analgesia consumption at the post anesthesia care unit(PACU) and postoperative day 1 -40-day postoperative (infectious) complications scored according to the relevant endpoint of the StEP-COMPAC group initiative and by the Clavien Dindo classification -Likert scale scores for surgical workings conditions and assessment stability hip prosthesis;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: - End of surgery - At the post anesthesia care unit direct after surgery - Postoperative day 1 - Postoperative day 40 | — |
Countries
Netherlands
Contacts
Radboudumc