Prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: PT Classification code 10049165 Term: Cerebrovascular accident prophylaxis System Organ Class: 10042613 - Surgical and medical procedures MedDRA version: 21.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10049910 Term: Thromboembolism prophylaxis System Organ Class: 10042613 - Surgical and medical procedures MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: PT Classification code 10003658 Term: Atrial fibrillation System Organ Class: 10
Conditions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. 18 years of age or older (at legal age of consent according to local legislation) at the time of signing the informed consent 2. Atrial fibrillation documented by ECG evidence with an indication for indefinite treatment with an oral anticoagulant 3. CHA2DS2-VASc score = 3 if male or = 4 if female, OR CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 if male or 3 if female and enrichment criteria. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 6000 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 12000
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Mechanical heart valve prosthesis 2. Moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis at the time of inclusion into the study 3. Atrial fibrillation only due to reversible cause 4. Requirement for chronic anticoagulation for a different indication than atrial fibrillation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Main Objective: - To demonstrate that asundexian is superior (at least non-inferior) when compared with apixaban for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in participants with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke - To demonstrate that asundexian is superior to apixaban as assessed by International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding in participants with atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke - To demonstrate that asundexian is superior to apixaban with respect to benefit and risk;Secondary Objective: - To compare the effects of asundexian and apixaban with respect to composite and individual efficacy endpoints - To compare asundexian and apixaban with respect to composite and individual bleeding endpoints - To compare the benefit and risk of asundexian and apixaban with respect to a composite of efficacy and safety endpoints;Primary end point(s): 1. Time to first occurrence of composite of stroke or systemic embolism 2. Time to first occurrence of ISTH major bleeding 3. Time to first occurrence of composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or ISTH major bleeding;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Up to 34 months | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary end point(s): 1. Time to first occurrence of composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism 2. Time to first occurrence of all-cause mortality 3. Time to first occurrence of ischemic stroke 4. Time to first occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) death 5. Time to first occurrence of composite of CV death, stroke, or myocardial infarction 6. Time to first occurrence of composite of ISTH major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding 7. Time to first occurrence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding 8. Time to first occurrence of hemorrhagic stroke 9. Time to first occurrence of intracranial hemorrhage 10. Time to first occurrence of fatal bleeding 11. Time to first occurrence of minor bleeding 12. Time to first occurrence of composite of stroke, systemic embolism, ISTH major bleeding, or all-cause mortality 13. Time to first occurrence of composite of disabling stroke (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) = 3), critical bleeding, or all-cause mortality ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Up to 34 months | — |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Colombia, Czechia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Singapore, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States
Contacts
Bayer