Patients with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic cancer
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: • > 18 years • Histologically proven malignancy (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma) • Radiologically confirmed metastatic disease by RECIST criteria • Leucocyte count > 3 G/l Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 6 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 4
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: • Current thyreostatic therapy • Current T4 or T3 substitution therapy • TSH 4 uIU/ml • AST, ALT > 3x ULN • GFR < 30 ml/min • Known allergy against methimazole • Pregnancy / breastfeeding • ECOG = 2 • Participation in another interventional study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Main Objective: We aim to test the feasibility of Methimazole at a starting dose of 5 mg/day in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer ;Secondary Objective: We aim to test the effects of pharmacologically induced subclinical hypothyroidism on cancer progression compared to a retrospective control group matched for sex, age, cancer entity, stage of disease and chemotherapy regimens. ;Primary end point(s): •Presence of subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH > 4 uIU/ml) after 12 weeks treatment with methimazole;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: After 12 weeks of treatment | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary end point(s): • quality of life (ThyPRO; EORTC QLQ-C30 Version 3; EORTC QLQ-FA12) • number of interruptions of methimazole treatment due to fatigue • number of interruptions of methimazole treatment due to leucopenia • number of interruptions of methimazole treatment due to elevated liver parameters • progression-free survival (interval from start of chemotherapy until progression of disease or death of any cause) • best clinical benefit rate (stable disease + partial response + complete response) compared to the matched control group • best objective response rate (partial response + complete response) compared to the matched control group • CRP/Albumin ratio after 12 weeks compared to the matched control group • Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after 12 weeks compared to the matched control group • Leucocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio after 12 weeks compared to the matched control group • Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio after 12 weeks compared to the matched control group • Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio after 12 weeks compared to the matched control group • CA 19-9, CEA after 12 weeks compared to the matched control group;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: After 12 weeks of treatment | — |
Countries
Austria
Contacts
Medical University of Vienna