Prostate Cancer MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10036910 Term: Prostate cancer NOS System Organ Class: 100000004864 MedDRA version: 21.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10065410 Term: Combined positron emission tomogram and computerized tomogram System Organ Class: 100000004848
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: High risk prostate cancer (defined as PSA>20 or cT2c or ISUP grade 4-5 (Gleason score 8-10)) according to EAU guidelines. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 25 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 25
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: • Prior or current therapy for prostate cancer. • History of another malignancy within the previous 5 years other than curatively treated non-melanoma skin cancer • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of the 68Ga-PSMA or 18F-PSMA radiotracers • Subjects with severe claustrophobia unresponsive to oral anxiolytics • Subjects weighing more than 180 kilograms (weight limit for scanner table), or unable to fit within the imaging gantry • Subjects with any medical condition or other circumstances that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would significantly decrease the reliability of data, achievement of study objectives or completing the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Main Objective: The primary purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic properties by the two PSMA-ligands (18F-PSMA PET/CT vs 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. ;Secondary Objective: Secondary purposes is; to investigate the added value of PSMA PET/CT in patients with standard imaging.;Primary end point(s): Primary end point is difference between diagnostic properties (Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy) by the two PSMA-ligands for staging of high risk prostate cancer.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: End of study | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Secondary end point(s): Secondary end point is impact of PSMA PET/CT on detection of additional metastases compared to standard imaging.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: End of study | — |
Countries
Denmark
Contacts
Aalborg University Hospital