Skip to content

Treosulfan, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide as a preparative chemotherapy regimen before haploidentical blood or marrow stem cell transplantation

A prospective, controlled, single-arm pilot study on treosulfan, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide (TreoFC) as conditioning treatment before haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2021-004730-11-AT
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-01-04
Start date
2022-02-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conditioning therapy before haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation MedDRA version: 22.0 Level: LLT Classification code 10059044 Term: Allogeneic peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplant System Organ Class: 100000004865

Interventions

Trade Name: Trecondi Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for solution for infusion INN or Proposed INN: Treosulfan CAS Number: 299-75-2 Concentration unit: mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre Concentration type: eq

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) according to WHO 2016 (AML in complete remission at transplant, i.e., blast counts 2 [according to Sorror et al., 2005] 2. Availability of a haploidentical (HLA match =5/10) first- or second-degree related donor. Donor selection is based on molecular high-resolution typing (4 digits) of class II alleles of the DRB1 and DQB1 gene loci and molecular (at least) low-resolution typing (2 digits) of class I alleles (i.e., antigens) of the HLA- A, B, and C gene loci. 3. Adult patients of both gender, age 18-70 years 4. Karnofsky Index =60 % 5. Written informed consent 6. Men capable of reproduction and women of childbearing potential must be willing to consent to use a highly effective method of birth control such as condoms, implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, IUDs, sexual abstinence, or vasectomized partner while on treatment and for at least 6 months thereafter Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 20 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 10

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Availability of matched sibling donor eligible for stem cell donation 2. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12) and in CR1 3. Patients considered contraindicated for HSCT due to severe concomitant illness (within 3 weeks before scheduled day -6): • patients with severe renal impairment like patients on dialysis or prior renal transplantation or S-creatinine >3.0 x ULN or calculated creatinine-clearance 3x ULN or ALT/AST >5 x ULN 4. Active malignant involvement of the CNS 5. HIV-positivity, active non-controlled infectious disease under treatment (no decrease of CRP or PCT) including active viral liver infection 6. Previous allogeneic HSCT 7. Pleural effusion or ascites > 1.0L 8. Pregnancy or lactation 9. Known hypersensitivity to treosulfan, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and/or related ingredients 10. Participation in another experimental drug trial within 4 weeks before day -6 of the protocol 11. Non-cooperative behavior or non-compliance 12. Psychiatric diseases or conditions that might compromise the ability to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 1 year after haploidentical HSCT;Main Objective: •To assess the efficacy and safety of TreoFC conditioning before haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in older or comorbid patients. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) 1 year after haploidentical HSCT.;Secondary Objective: •To assess rates of non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse-free survival (RFS), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and relapse-free survival (GRFS), acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, quality of life (QOL), toxicity, engraftment, and chimerism in the study population.;Primary end point(s): Overall survival

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): • Cumulative incidence of relapse • Relapse-free survival (RFS) • Graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival (GRFS) • Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) a • Cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) a • Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD • Toxicities according to the current version of the NCI CTCAE • Engraftment • Chimerism ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 1 year after haploidentical HSCT

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Public ContactDepartment of Meidince I / HSCT Uni

Medical University of Vienna

philipp.wohlfarth@meduniwien.ac.at0043140400 57000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026