Skip to content

Combining ethanol with clipping of the submandibular duct to treat drooling in children with neurodisabilities

Ethanol submandibular duct ligation for drooling in children with neurodisabilities - Ethanol 2-duct ligation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2021-004057-23-NL
Enrollment
5
Registered
2021-07-30
Start date
2022-02-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Drooling or sialorrhea

Interventions

Trade Name: Ethanol Product Name: Ethanol 96% Product Code: EP00159 Pharmaceutical Form: Concentrate and solvent for intravesical solution

Sponsors

Radboudumc
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Moderate to severe drooling indicated by Drooling Frequency Score = 3 or Drooling Severity Score = 2. 2. Aged 10 years and older. 3. Cerebral palsy or any other non-progressive neurodevelopmental disability. 4. Contra-indications for a SMDR, or rejection towards a SMDR by patient or caregiv-ers* 5. Ability and willingness to follow the study protocol and attend the 8 and 32-weeks vis-its. 6. Written and informed consent from caregivers, and when appropriate, oral consent from the child. * contra-indication for SMDR: - posterior drooling - pharyngeal dysphagia as judged by the speech and language therapist. - progressive neurodisability as judged by the child neurologist. Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: 5 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Medical history of salivary gland abnormalities like ductal stenosis, strictures 2. Previous submandibular salivary gland surgery, or other contraindications for surgery or general anesthesia. 3. Recent (<6 months) glandular Botulinum Neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection 4. Simultaneous alternative treatment for drooling.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of submandibular duct ligation right after intraductal ethanol infusion into the submandibular salivary gland;Secondary Objective: The secondary aims of the study are to evaluate effect, and to evaluate whether an out-patient setting is suitable for the procedure. ;Primary end point(s): a. Adverse events. b. Post-operative complaints c. Surgical time. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: baseline, 8 and 32 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: baseline, 8 and 32 weeks;Secondary end point(s): All parameters will be compared to the previous results of 2-DL without infusion of ethanol in this institution. Secondary study parameters. The following five variables will be collected as standard care although these are not among the outcomes of the current study. 1. Visual Analog Scale for the severity of drooling 2. Drooling Quotient 3. Treatment effect 4. Drooling Severity Scale 5. Drooling Frequency Scale 6. Costs

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactContact person

Radboudumc

stijn.bekkers@radboudumc.nl0031617377830

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026