Skip to content

A randomized comparison of one controlled ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa (CFA) versus up to three modified natural cycles (MNC) in expected and established poor responders

A randomized comparison of one controlled ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa (CFA) versus up to three modified natural cycles (MNC) in expected and established poor responders

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2021-001835-22-BE
Enrollment
300
Registered
2021-07-13
Start date
2021-10-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

this study will compare the efficacy of two different strategies for the management of predicted low prognosis patients under stimulation for IVF/ICSI: up to three MNCs (Modified Natural Cycle) (control group) versus a single GnRH antagonist CFA (corifollitropin alfa) (intervention group). The study population is aimed at women with a clinical indication for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) with an expected low response to ovarian stimulation.

Interventions

Trade Name: ELONVA Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injection INN or Proposed INN: CORIFOLLITROPIN ALFA CAS Number: 195962-23-3 Current Sponsor code: CORIFOLLITROPIN ALFA Concentration unit: µg/ml mi

Sponsors

Ghent University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The trial only includes women with a clinical indication for ART with an expected low response to ovarian stimulation. Expected low prognosis will be defined according to the POSEIDON classification, which stratifies patients according to whether they have an unexpected (groups 1 and 2) or expected (groups 3 or 4) inappropriate ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation. This trial only includes patients fulfilling the criteria of groups 3 or 4: • POSEIDON Group 3: patients =65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Basal FSH > 20 IU/L in the last 12 months • Simultaneous participation in another clinical study • Untreated and uncontrolled thyroid dysfunction • Tumors of the ovary, breast, uterus, pituitary or hypothalamus • Abnormal (not menstrual) vaginal bleeding without a known/diagnosed cause • Malformations of the reproductive organs • Current use of oral contraceptives, anti-psychotics, anti-epileptics or chemotherapy • Previous antibiotic hypersensitivity reactions (streptomycin and/or neomycin) • Patients who undergo preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), fertility preservation or oocyte donation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objective is to compare the probability of having at least one good quality blastocyst after CFA stimulation versus the probability of having at least one good quality blastocyst after a first MNC, in women with a clinical indication for ART and an expected low response to ovarian stimulation. Good quality is defined by the Gardner score 5AA, 5AB or 5BA.;Secondary Objective: Secondary objectives are to compare the probability of having at least one good quality blastocyst after CFA stimulation versus the probability of having at least one good quality blastocyst after a second or third MNC, in women with a clinical indication for ART and an expected low response to ovarian stimulation. Further secondary objectives are to compare A.One cycle of CFA versus B.two, or up to three MNCs With respect to -the relative number of blastocysts after ART, relative to the number of oocytes -the probability of having at least one blastocyst of good quality after ART -the probability of having an ongoing pregnancy -the time until ongoing pregnancy in women with a clinical indication for ART and an expected low response to ovarian stimulation. ;Primary end point(s): The primary end point is the probability of having at least one good quality blastocyst after ART (on the day of embryo transfer) ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: on the day of embryo transfer

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Secondary end points are - the relative number of blastocyts after ART (on the day of embryo transfer), relative to the number of oocytes (rate) - the probability of having at least one blastocyst of good quality after ART (on the day of embryo transfer) (binary endpoint) - the probability of having an ongoing pregnancy which is defined as 6 to 8 weeks gestational age (binary endpoint) o Related sensitivity endpoint:, as confirmed by ultrasound (time to event) ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: - relative number of blastocyts after ART (on the day of embryo transfer) - probability of having at least one blastocyst of good quality after ART (on the day of embryo transfer) - the probability of having an ongoing pregnancy which is defined as 6 to 8 weeks gestational age

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Public ContactHiruz CTU

Ghent University Hospital

hiruz.ctu@uzgent.be+3293320500

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026