Skip to content

Effect of Tinzaparin on inflammatory biomarkers during the acute phase of deep vein thrombosis

Effect of Tinzaparin on inflammatory biomarkers during the acute phase of deep vein thrombosis

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2020-005467-31-FR
Enrollment
12
Registered
2020-11-30
Start date
2021-01-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

acute phase of deep vein thrombosis

Interventions

Trade Name: INNOHEP Product Name: Tinzaparine Pharmaceutical Form: Injection

Sponsors

CHU Amiens-Picardie
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Adult patients with a first episode of symptomatic, proximal DVT of the lower limbs, confirmed by Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) - Indication for treatment with Tinzaparin Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 8 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 4

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Recent DVT (less than 2 months) other than the index event with or without PE - Severe ilio-femoral DVT requiring recanalization - Duration of treatment of more than 24 h since diagnosis - Planned surgery in the following 3 weeks, impossible to postpone - Active haemorrhage or high risk of haemorrhage - Symptoms of Post Thrombotic Syndrome - Active neoplasm - APL syndrome - Renal insufficiency (Creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) <20 mL/min) -Hepatic disease / or Hepatic Insufficiency / or serious liver disease - Any anti-inflammatory drugs or anti-platelet therapy - Any other concomitant anticoagulant treatment such as VKA, heparin, fondaparinux - Contraindications to LMWH according to their SmPC

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Levels of other biological inflammation markers during the study (CRP, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, Pselectin, TFPI, D Dimers, NETS, MMP2, MMP9, VIII, TGT,PPL-ct, C3c, C4c, Xa activity, factor II and IV) - Percentage of complete recanalization measured by duplex ultrasoundat day 21 - Comparison between recanalization and inflammatory markers ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Day 1, 3,5,7,10,15 and day 21

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: to illustrate the I-CAM serum levels decrease after an acute DVT;Secondary Objective: - To evaluate the relationship between inflammatory markers and clinical symptoms. - To evaluate the relationship between inflammatory markers and the number of patients with partial recanalization (50%) or complete recanalization at 21 days. ;Primary end point(s): CAM levels variation in each patient during time;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: day 21

Countries

France

Contacts

Public ContactProject Manager

CHU Amiens-Picardie

mattoug.salah@chu-amiens.fr

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026