Skip to content

Study of the antiresorptive treatment with alendronate versus no treatment after denosumab and aromatase inhibitors discontinuation in low fracture risk osteopenic postmenopausal women with non metastatic hormonal receptor positive breast cancer.

Effect of the antiresorptive treatment with alendronate versus no treatment after denosumab and aromatase inhibitors discontinuation in low fracture risk osteopenic postmenopausal women with non metastatic hormonal receptor positive breast cancer (the ADAIDO study, Alendronate after Denosumab and Aromatase Inhibitors Discontinuation in Osteopenic women with breast cancer). - -

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2020-005343-23-IT
Enrollment
190
Registered
2021-06-08
Start date
2021-05-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

post-menopausal osteoporosis in women with non-metastatic hormonal receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: PT Classification code 10049088 Term: Osteopenia System Organ Class: 10028395 - Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

Interventions

Trade Name: BINOSTO - 70 MG COMPRESSE EFFERVESCENTI Product Name: Acido Alendronico Product Code: [Binosto] Pharmaceutical Form: Effervescent tablet INN or Proposed INN: ACIDO ALENDRONICO CAS Number:

Sponsors

IRCCS ISTITUTO ORTOPEDICO GALEAZZI S.P.A
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patient who have signed and dated the informed consent form approved by EC, before undergoing any study-specific procedure; - Postmenopausal women (absence of spontaneous menstrual cycle for at least 12 months); - Treated for breast cancer with AI (letrozole, anastrozole, examestane) for at least two years; - Denosumab stopped at least 4 months before ICF signature, after at least 2 year treatment duration to prevent/treat the CTIBL (in primary prevention); - Affected with osteopenia, diagnosed as femoral T-scores by DXA performed within the last 36 months from the AI discontinuation, within the range -1.0 to -2.4 (WHO criteria for diagnosis of osteoporosis)[16], - with low risk fracture, defined as a 10-years predicted fracture risk =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 60

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Age > 75 years; - BMI 35 kg/m2; - Osteoporosis diagnosed as femoral T-score by DXA ¿ -2.5 (test performed as routine) - Clinical or morphometric fractures detected by thoracic and lumbar Rx - Recent invasive dental surgery with no complete healing at moment of inclusion - Type 1 diabetes mellitus; - Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (HbA1c >7.5%, 58 mmol/mol); - Rheumatoid arthritis; - Current steroid or immunosuppressive therapies; - Active endocrinopathies (except hypothyroidism with good hormonal balance); -Chronic alcoholism - Chronic kidney disease stages 4-5 according to CKD-EPI (eGFR < 30 ml/min) (test performed as routine); - Hepatic cirrhosis, HCV and HBV-related chronic hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis (autodeclaration); - Previous treatments with amino-bisphosphonates (except previous treatment with clodronate); - Known history of reflux esophagitis. - Other known contraindications to bisphosphonates

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To evaluate the effect of alendronate versus no treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) in the following 12 months after the denosumab and aromatase inhibitors (AI) discontinuation in low fracture risk (defined as a10-years predicted fracture risk < 20% for major osteoporotic fractures and < 3% for femur fractures according the FRAX algorithm) osteopenic women with post-menopausal non-metastatic hormonal receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer.;Secondary Objective: In low fracture risk osteopenic women with post-menopausal non-metastatic hormonal receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer, to evaluate the effect of alendronate versus no treatment: 1. on the turnover biomarkers in the following 3, 12 and 24 months after the denosumab and aromatase inhibitors (AI) discontinuation 2. on bone mineral density (BMD) at the end of 24 months of follow up after the denosumab and aromatase inhibitors (AI) discontinuation 3. on vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in the following two years after the denosumab and AI discontinuation 4. on morphometric vertebral fractures in the following 12 and 24 months after the denosumab and AI discontinuation in low fracture risk osteopenic women with post-menopausal breast cancer. 5. To monitor the adverse events/clinical in treated and untreated patients.;Primary end point(s): Percent changes in BMD measured at lumbar and femoral sites at 12 months with respect to basal conditions;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Basal assessment (time 0) and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1. changes in serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase activity, CTX, P1NP and FGF23 at 3, 12 and 24 months with respect to basal levels; 2. changes in BMD measured at lumbar and femoral sites at 24 months with respect to basal conditions; 3. occurrence of new fragility fractures at any sites anamnestically recorded at 3, 12 and 24 months visits; 4. detection of new morphometric vertebral fractures by thoracic and lumbar Rx at 12 and 24 months of follow up; 5. incidence of the adverse events/clinical and morphometric fractures in treated and untreated patients;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 1. Basal assessment (time 0), 3, 12 and 24 months 2. Basal assessment (time 0) and 24 months 3. 3, 12 and 24 months 4. 12 and 24 months 5 . Up to 24 months

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Public ContactDipartimento Medico

OPIS s.r.l.

info.studiclinici@opis.it003903626331

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026