Skip to content

Amcenestrant (SAR439859) plus palbociclib as first line therapy for patients with ER(+) HER2(-) advanced breast cancer

A randomized, multicenter, double-blind phase 3 study of amcenestrant (SAR439859) plus palbociclib versus letrozole plus palbociclib for the treatment of patients with ER (+), HER2 (-) breast cancer who have not received prior systemic anti-cancer treatment for advanced disease - AMEERA-5

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2020-001824-33-NL
Enrollment
1333
Registered
2020-09-08
Start date
2020-11-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ER (+), HER2 (-) breast cancer MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: PT Classification code 10006187 Term: Breast cancer System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) MedDRA version: 21.1 Level: PT Classification code 10028997 Term: Neoplasm malignant System Organ Class: 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)

Interventions

Product Name: amcenestrant Product Code: SAR439859 Pharmaceutical Form: Film-coated tablet INN or Proposed INN: amcenestrant Current Sponsor code: SAR439859 Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concent

Sponsors

Sanofi-Aventis Recherche & Développement
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Adult participants with loco-regional recurrent or metastatic disease not amenable to curative treatment -Confirmed diagnosis of ER+/HER2- breast cancer -No prior systemic treatment for loco-regional recurrent or metastatic disease -Measurable disease evaluable per Response Evaluation Criterion in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v.1.1 or non-measurable bone-only disease -Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 -Participants should be willing to provide tumor tissue -Capable of giving informed consent Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 800 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 533

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Known active brain metastases -Prior neo (adjuvant) treatment with any selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) -Inadequate organ and marrow function -Disease recurrence while on, or within 12 months of completion of (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy -Pregnant, breastfeeding, or woman of child bearing potential unwilling to use recommended contraception methods -Male participants who disagree to follow contraception -Participants with advanced, symptomatic visceral spread, that are at risk of life-threatening complications in the short term -Participants with significant concomitant illness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To determine whether Amcenestrant (SAR439859) in combination with palbociclib improves progression free survival (PFS) when compared with letrozole in combination with palbociclib in participants with ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer who have not received any prior systemic anticancer therapies for advanced disease.;Secondary Objective: -To compare the overall survival in both treatment arms -To evaluate the objective response rate in both treatment arms -To evaluate the duration of response in both treatment arms -To evaluate the clinical benefit rate in both treatment arms -To evaluate progression-free survival on next line of therapy -To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of amcenestrant, and palbociclib -To evaluate health-related quality of life in both treatment arms -To evaluate the time to first chemotherapy in both treatment arms -To evaluate safety in both treatment arms;Primary end point(s): Progression-free survival. Progression-free survival is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) or death (due to any cause), whichever come first.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression OR death (up to approximately 4 years)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1. Overall Survival. Overall survival is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of documented death (due to any cause). 2. Objective Response Rate. Objective response rate is defined as the proportion of participants who have a CR or PR, as best overall response determined as per RECIST 1.1, from the date of randomization to the date of until disease progression, death, cutoff date, initiation of post-treatment anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first. 3. Duration of Response. Duration of response is defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until progressive disease (PD) as determined as per RECIST 1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. 4. Clinical Benefit Rate. Clinical benefit rate is defined as the proportion of participants who have a confirmed CR, PR, or SD for at least 24 weeks determined as per RECIST 1.1, from the date of randomization until disease progression, death, cutoff date, initiation of post-treatment anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first. 5. PK parameter: Plasma concentrations. Plasma concentrations of Amcenestrant and palbociclib. 6. Number of participants with treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Incidence of participants with TEAEs, SAEs and laboratory abnormalities according to NCI CTCAE V5. 7. Time to First Chemotherapy. Time to chemotherapy is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the start date of the first chemotherapy after study treatment discontinuation. 8. Health state utility and health status will be assessed using the European Quality of Life Group questionnaire with 5 dimensions and 5 levels per dimension (EQ-5D-5L). Change From Baseline between treatment comparison Using the European Quality of Life- 5-Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D 5L). 9. Disease-specific HRQL will be assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core quality of lif

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Czechia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Korea, Republic of, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russian Federation, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

Public ContactTeam manager

Genzyme Europe BV

startup.nl@sanofi.com0031202454000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026