Skip to content

Simultaneous treatment of upper and two thirds of the face with IncobotulinumtoxinA applied intradermally (Interventional Phase II)

Skin perception after intradermal application of IncobotulinumtoxinA within upper and midface (Interventional Phase II) - First data on change in skin perception after intradermal injection of IncobotulinumtoxinA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2020-001318-39-DE
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-03-09
Start date
2021-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin perception after intradermal application of INCOBOTULINUMTOXIN A within upper and midface

Interventions

Trade Name: Bocouture Product Name: Bocouture Product Code: Bocouture Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for solution for injection INN or Proposed INN: Botulinum-Toxin A for injection Other descriptive name

Sponsors

Prof. Dr. Martina Kerscher, University of Hamburg
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 40 female patients, aged 30 – 50 (premenopausal) being dissatisfied with skin quality (suffering from increased skin surface roughness, dilated pores, uneven skin surface) Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 40 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Additional to Botulinum type A exclusion criteria: no HA, PRP or other autologous treatment, no Calciumhydroxylapatite (CaHA), no radiofrequency, Ultherapy in relevant treatment area within last 12 months. Not pregnant, not breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To obtain first data on changes in skin perception after intradermal injection of IncobotulinumtoxinA into upper and mid face . Change in skin surface roughness before and 4 weeks after intradermal injection of IncobotulinumtoxinA (primary efficacy criterion).;Secondary Objective: Change in skin physiology (pH, TEWL, Sebumetry, Cutometry, Corneometry), GICS, Skin Quality Assessment, patient satisfaction after intradermal injection of IncobotulinumtoxinA (time points: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 and 16 weeks) after injection (secondary efficacy criteria) and skin surface roughness after 8, 12 and 16 weeks);Primary end point(s): Change in skin surface roughness parameters (Skin smoothness (SEsm), Skin roughness (SEr), Scaly / Scaliness (SEsc) and Folds / wrinkles (SEw) at day 30 compared to base-line after intradermal injection of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the upper two thirds of the face by using Visioscan® VC 20plus;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 30 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Change in skin surface roughness parameters (Skin smoothness (SEsm), Skin roughness (SEr), Scaly / Scaliness (SEsc) and Folds / wrinkles (SEw) at days 60, 90, 120 and 150 compared to baseline after intradermal injection of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the upper two thirds of the face by using Visioscan® VC 20plus Change in skin physiology parameters (pH, TEWL, Sebumetry, Cutometry, Corneome-try) at days 30, 60, 90, 120 and 160 within the treatment areas Response in skin quality at days 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 as assessed by a blinded rater using validated skin quality assessment scales Change of skin microbiome at day 30 and 60 compared to baseline. Response at patient satisfaction at days 30, 60, 90, 120 and 150 for the overall appear-ance of the upper two thirds of the face, as assessed independently from each other by the investigator and the subject according to the Global Impression of Change Scale, i.e. a score of much improved (+2) or very much improved (+3). Response at patient satisfaction by Facial Appearance Self-Perception Questionnaire (FASAQ) by assessing the statements and marking them according to the percentage (0% = "I do not agree" to 100% = "I fully agree"). The statements relate only to the face and external appearance compare to baseline. Assessment of wrinkle intensity at rest and at maximum contraction. These assessments will be performed using validated assessment scales (Merz Aesthetics Scales) (see Ap-pendix 3) for the treated areas Glabella (GFL), Forehead (HFL)and periorbital wrinkles (LPL).;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: See E.5.2

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026