Skip to content

Antibiotics in the prevention of wound infections after implant removal below the level of the knee

Wound Infections following Implant Removal below the level of the knee; the influence of 2g of prophylactic Cefazolin - WIFI-2

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2019-003105-10-NL
Enrollment
732
Registered
2019-10-15
Start date
2019-12-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Site Infections

Interventions

Trade Name: Cefazolin Product Name: Cefazoline Mylan Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for injection

Sponsors

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Aged between 18 and 75 years - Scheduled for IR following fracture surgery of the patella, lower leg, ankle or foot Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 632 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 100

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Removing and re-implanting osteosynthetic material in the same session - Active wound infection or (plate) fistula - Antibiotic treatment at time of IR for a concomitant disease or infection - A medical history of severe hypersensitivity to penicillin or any other beta-lactam antibiotic - Severe kidney insufficiency (eGFR < 35) - Pregnancy and lactation - Treatment with probenecid, anticoagulants (see SPC) - Immunosuppressant use in organ transplantation or rheumatoid joint disease - Insufficient comprehension of the Dutch/English language to understand the patient information to make an informed decision to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The primary objective is to study the effectiveness of a single intravenous dose of 2g of cefazolin on SSIs after IR following fixation of foot, ankle and/or lower leg fractures. ; Secondary Objective: Secondary Objective(s): - To study the cost-effectiveness of 2g of cefazolin preventing SSIs after IR - To elucidate the underlying mechanism of antibiotic prophylaxis by measuring tissue oxygenation and target-site concentrations of cefazolin - To identify possible underlying infections (before IR) - To identify independent predictors of SSI ; Primary end point(s): The primary outcome parameter is SSI within 90 days, as defined by the criteria used in the latest CDC guideline for the prevention of SSI. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Secondary outcomes include: - Cost-effectiveness of intervention: measured with health care resource utilization and costs (iMCQ, iPCQ); at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery and using quality adjusted life years (QUALY's), measured by the 5-level EuroQuality of Life-5D (EQ-5D-5L); at baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery - target-site antibiotic concentrations: The time that target site concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin stay above the minimal inhibitory concentration needed to adequately prevent SSIs (T>MIC) will be measured during surgery from at least two samples at varying time points in blood and soft tissue from incision site. In addition, the concentration of cefazolin will be measured in serum, to construct a multi-compartment pharmacokinetic model (only selected patients) - tissue oxygenation: Measured during surgery by a micro-catheter in the tip of a flexible probe inserted in the subcutaneous tissue of the contralateral ankle (only selected patients). - underlying infections: diagnosed by analyzing the presence of pathogens on removed implants, determined by culture of removed material (only Amsterdam UMC); directly following surgery - independent predictors of SSI, measured by a multivariate regression analysis/subgroup analysis of patient and treatment characteristics (e.g. weight, smoking) ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: At 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after surgery

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026