Skip to content

A Multicenter, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Diagnostic Efficacy of Mangoral in Patients with Known or Suspected Focal Liver Lesions and Severe Renal Impairment

A Multicenter, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Diagnostic Efficacy of Mangoral in Patients with Known or Suspected Focal Liver Lesions and Severe Renal Impairment - SPARKLE

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2019-001599-12-SE
Enrollment
197
Registered
2019-09-30
Start date
2019-11-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

MRI in terms of visualization of detected focal liver lesions in patients with known or Suspected focal liver lesions and severe renal impairment MedDRA version: 22.1 Level: LLT Classification code 10028049 Term: MRI System Organ Class: 100000004848

Interventions

Product Code: Mangoral Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for oral solution in sachet INN or Proposed INN: Mangoral CAS Number: 13446-34-9 Current Sponsor code: Mangoral (CMC-001) Other descriptive name: MAN

Sponsors

Ascelia Pharma AB
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Male and female patients 18 years and older Known or suspected focal liver lesions based on medical history and previous laboratory and/or imaging examinations Severe renal impairment such as: a. Chronic kidney disease [CKD] (estimated glomerular filtrationrate [eGFR] =65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 40

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with simple liver cysts only Any investigational drug or device within 6 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit. Any MRI contrast media within 6 weeks prior to Baseline Visit or scheduled to receive any contrast medium before the last study visit. Patients severe hepatic impairment (according to Child-Pugh score C). Patients scheduled for surgery before last study visit. Patients with encephalopathy / neurodegenerative or acute neurological disorders. Patients with hemochromatosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To assess the diagnostic efficacy of Mangoral in liver MRI in terms of visualization of detected focal liver lesions in combined MRI (CMRI: combined Mangoral-enhanced and unenhanced MRI) compared to unenhanced MRI. Lesion visualization will be determined by qualitative assessments of lesion border delineation and lesion contrast compared to background liver on 4-point scales for up to 15 lesions per patient. ;Secondary Objective: • To assess the diagnostic efficacy of Mangoral in liver MRI in terms of: - no. lesions detected by each MRI method; - visualization of detected focal liver lesions in Mangoral-enhanced MRI comp. to unenhanced MRI; - confidence in lesion detection and localization in each MRI method; - lesion dimensions... - quantitative assessments … signal intensity enhancement of liver, liver-to-lesion contrast, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio - up to 5 lesions/pat.; - no. of patients who had at least 1 new lesion identified on CMRI compared to unenhanced MRI • To assess a proportion of pat. having at least 1 malignant lesion identified on postmangoral images that was not identified on pre-mangoral images. • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of Mangoral; • To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of manganese after a single dose of Mangoral in a subgroup of pat. • To evaluate the impact of diagnostic performance of CMRI and Mangoral-enhanced MRI versus unenhanced MRI ...;Primary end point(s): The primary efficacy endpoint will be the visualization of detected focal liver lesions in combined MRI (CMRI, Mangoral-enhanced MRI plus unenhanced MRI) as compared to unenhanced MRI. Efficacy will be assessed by testing the superiority of each of the 2 co-primary variables: •lesion border delineation (BD), and •lesion contrast compared to liver background (LC). ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Assessments will be done during central reading sessions. All unenhanced and Mangoral-enhanced MRI image sets will be evaluat

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): - Number of lesions detected by each MRI method: unenhanced MRI, Mangoral-enhanced MRI, and CMRI. - Visualization of focal liver lesions in Mangoral-enhanced MRI as compared to unenhanced MRI - Confidence in lesion detection separately in unenhanced MRI, Mangoral-enhanced MRI, and CMRI - Confidence in lesion localization separately in unenhanced MRI, Mangoral-enhanced MRI, and CMRI - Lesion dimensions - Quantitative assessments - Change(s) in patients’ management based on diagnostic performance of CMRI or Mangoral-enhanced MRI vs. unenhanced MRI. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Assessments will be done during central reading sessions as described in E.5.1.1. Additionally on-site evaluation will be done by each site investigator (or on-site radiologist) at the respective study site and will include separate assessments of all unenhanced and Mangoral-enhanced images of each patient. Data of on-site assessments will be used for analysis of specific secondary efficacy variables. In addition, brain MRI images will be evaluated by the independent off-site radiologist. Offsite evaluations should be performed within 5 working days after the respective MRI examination.

Countries

Argentina, Colombia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Russian Federation, Sweden, Turkey, United States

Contacts

Public ContactMarie Källström

Ascelia Pharma AB

mk@ascelia.com+46735179120

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026