Skip to content

Stem cell transplantation versus disease modifying therapy (alemtuzumab or ocrelizumab) for patients with highly active relapsing remitting MS

A multicentre, randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus alemtuzumab or ocrelizumab in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis. - StarMS

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2019-001549-42-GB
Enrollment
198
Registered
2020-02-03
Start date
2020-03-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis MedDRA version: 20.1 Level: PT Classification code 10028245 Term: Multiple sclerosis System Organ Class: 10029205 - Nervous system disorders

Interventions

Product Name: Cyclophosphamide Pharmaceutical Form: Powder for solution for infusion INN or Proposed INN: Cyclophosphamide monohydrate CAS Number: 50-18-0 Concentration unit: gm/m2 gram(s)/square mete

Sponsors

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosis of MS using the 2017 McDonald criteria. 2. Age 16-55 inclusive. 3. EDSS 0-6.0 inclusive*. If the EDSS score is 6.0 this must be due to confirmed relapse rather than progressive disease. 4. Severe inflammatory disease defined as RRMS course with 2 or more protocol defined relapses, or 1 such relapse and evidence of MRI disease activity >3 months before or after its onset, in last 12 months despite being on a DMT*. 5. Clinical stability for >30 days following last relapse at the time of screening. 6. Satisfactory EBMT Autoimmune Disease Working Party (ADWP) recommended screening assessment prior to aHSCT. 7. Participants who have been reviewed by the central neurology team and confirmed as eligible. 8. Participants who, in the opinion of the local haematology lead or delegate, are fit enough to undergo treatment. 9. Able to undergo MRI examination. * Patients with EDSS scores of 0-1.5 or those who failed only first line treatments must also fulfil following criteria: short illness duration (=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 0

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosis of primary or secondary progressive MS. 2. Disease duration of >10 years from symptom onset (note: symptoms must be clearly attributable to MS). 3. Previous use of alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab or cladribine. 4. Previous HSCT for any reason, or any previous experimental or commercial stem cell therapy. 5. JCV antibody Index of >1.5 in patients previously treated with natalizumab (unless they are CSF JCV PCR negative). 6. Prior diagnosis of Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C or HIV infection or current TB infection. 7. Pregnant or breast-feeding females. 8. Unwilling to use adequate contraception during the trial. Female participants of child-bearing potential must be willing to use adequate contraception for the duration of the trial (24 months). Male participants with female partners of child-bearing potential must be willing to use adequate contraception if they are randomised to the aHSCT arm until at least 6 months after discontinuation of cyclophosphamide. 9. Unable to comply with treatment protocol. 10. Contraindication to the use of cyclophosphamide, G-CSF (filgrastim or lenograstim) or rabbit ATG. 11. Participants with significant medical co-morbidity that precludes aHSCT as assessed by the local haematology team. 12. Significant language barriers, which are likely to affect the participant’s understanding of the study, or ability to complete outcome questionnaires. 13. Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial. 14. AST and ALT >2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN or direct bilirubin >ULN for participants with total bilirubin levels >1.5 x ULN 15. Current diagnosis of a clinically defined bleeding disorder (patients with platelet counts of 100x109/l or above up to normal range are not excluded, as per section 18d. Persistently abnormal coagulation tests should be addressed to determine whether they constitute a defined bleeding disorder). 16. Current diagnosis of a clinically defined autoimmune disorder other than multiple sclerosis. (i.e. meeting full current international clinical and laboratory criteria for a specific autoimmune disorder). 17. Patients with history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke or arterial dissection 18. Participants who are not considered medically fit for aHSCT defined by any of the following. Note that these criteria are not automatic exclusion criteria but if any of these criteria are met, and in the opinion of the PI the participant is medically fit enough to undergo aHSCT, the case may be put forward to the central team for discussion about eligibility: a. Renal: creatinine clearance <40ml/min (measured or estimated) b. Cardiac: clinical evidence of refractory congestive heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction <45% by cardiac echo; uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmia; pericardial effusion with haemodynamic consequences as evaluated by an experienced echo cardiographer c. Concurrent neoplasms or myelodysplasia d. Bone marrow insufficiency defined as neutropenia with an absolute neutrophil count <1x109/l, or thrombocytopenia with a platelet count <100x109/l, or anaemia with a haemoglobin <100g/l e. Diagnosis of hypertension, which is uncontrolled despite at least 2 anti-hypertensive agents. f. Uncontrolled acute or chronic infection with any infection the investigator or central team consider a contraindication to participation. (N.B. Baseline JC virus serology will be recorded, but positivity w

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The main objective of this trial is to assess whether autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is more effective at maintaining clinical stability in patients with highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) than treatment with a disease modifying therapy (alemtuzumab or ocrelizumab). Definitions: Autologous = cells or tissue obtained from the same individual Haematopoietic = cells that give rise to blood cells;Secondary Objective: The secondary objectives are: - to assess the safety and toxicity of aHSCT compared to DMTs (alemtuzumab or ocrelizumab) - to assess the impact of aHSCT compared to DMTs (alemtuzumab or ocrelizumab) on disability and quality of life - to assess the impact of aHSCT compared to DMTs (alemtuzumab or ocrelizumab) on other clinical outcomes ;Primary end point(s): Proportion of patients who have maintained NEDA status (defined as the absence of all three of the following: protocol defined clinical relapses; 6 months confirmed EDSS progression of at least 1 point with an absence of relapse at the time of assessment; any evidence of MRI disease activity as defined by T1 Gd-enhanced lesion or new and/or enlarging T2 lesion after month 6) in the 2-year post-randomisation follow up period.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 2 years after randomisation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Safety i) Serious adverse event (SAE) rate within the 2-year follow up period for each treatment arm ii) Mortality rate (grade 5 SAEs) within the 2-year follow up period for each treatment arm iii) Combined grade 4 and 5 SAE rates within the 2-year follow up period for each treatment arm iv) Total number of adverse events (AEs) experienced by each patient in the 100 days post-randomisation v) Total number of AEs within the 2-year follow up period for each treatment arm vi) Long term safety events, including rates of significant infections, endocrine and reproductive dysfunction, secondary autoimmune diseases, incidence of late cardiovascular events, neoplasia and any other significant organ dysfunction within the 2-year follow up period (Ongoing data will be recorded for aHSCT participants via routine BSBMT/EBMT registry however follow up and analysis will be subject to additional funding and support). Please refer to section 8 for the suggested long term screening assessments for late effects of HSCT. Clinical outcomes i) Time to evidence of disease activity. Disease activity is defined as the presence of one of the following: protocol defined clinical relapses; confirmed EDSS progression of at least 1 point sustained for 6 months with an absence of relapse at the time of assessment; evidence of MRI disease activity defined as T1 Gd-enhanced lesion or new and/or enlarging T2 lesion after the re-baseline MRI at 6 months post-randomisation. ii) EDSS scores at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months post-randomisation iii) MSFC scores at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months post-randomisation iv) Low contrast visual acuity scores at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months post-randomisation Quality of Life/Health Economic Measures i) EQ-5D-5L utility scores at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months post-randomisation ii) Eight RAND SF-36 dimension (Physical functioning, Role limitations due to physical health, Role limitations due to emotional problems, Energy/fatigue, E

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactJennifer Petrie

Sheffield Clinical Trials Research Unit, The University of Sheffield

j.petrie@sheffield.ac.uk01142220676

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026