Skip to content

A pilot study of the efficacy and safety of dupilumab versus placebo in patients with Netherton syndrome

A randomized double-blinded pilot study of the efficacy and safety of dupilumab versus placebo in patients with Netherton syndrome - NS-Dupi

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2019-001220-35-FR
Enrollment
24
Registered
2019-04-23
Start date
2019-10-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Netherton syndrome MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: PT Classification code 10062909 Term: Netherton's syndrome System Organ Class: 10010331 - Congenital, familial and genetic disorders

Interventions

Trade Name: Dupixent Product Name: DUPILUMAB Product Code: SAR231893 Pharmaceutical Form: Suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Suspension for injection in

Sponsors

CHU de Toulouse
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Adult patients (=18 years) affiliated to a social insurance protection regimen. -Clinical diagnosis of NS and absent or marked reduction of LEKTI staining. -Moderate to severe forms: NASA (Netherton Area Severity Assessment score) score = 5/12 at inclusion. -Patients able to understand the study procedures including the ability to complete patient-based self-assessment questionnaires. -Patients who agree to sign the written informed consent. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 24 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Hypersensitivity to dupilumab or its excipients. - Modification of the usual treatment within 2 weeks before inclusion. - Treatment with topical calcineurin inhibitors 1 week before inclusion. - Treatment with oral immunosuppressant , oral retinoids or phototherapy within 4 weeks before inclusion. - Treatment with immunomodulating biologics 16 weeks before inclusion. - Treatment with another investigational drug within 8 weeks before inclusion. - Treatment with a systemic antibiotic within 1 week before inclusion. - Active skin infection requiring the use of a systemic therapy within 2 weeks before the inclusion. - Any other condition that according to the investigator will impair the ability to evaluate treatment effect. - Known or suspected history of immunosuppression, including history of invasive opportunistic infections - Current infections including infection with helminthes. - Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study. - Mental or physical incapacity to fill in the questionnaires.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: to assess the effect of dupilumab versus placebo on the severity of the disease in patients with moderate to severe NS as determined by the evolution at week 16 vs. baseline using a specific disease severity score (NASA).;Secondary Objective: - To assess the effect of dupilumab versus placebo on the evolution of severity of the disease in patients with moderate to severe NS at each visit versus baseline, using a specific disease severity score and other clinical parameters. - Effect on the bacterial or viral cutaneous secondary infections - Effect on the reduction of dermocorticosteroid intake - Effect on the evolution of quality of life at week 16 and week 28 versus baseline. - Effect on the evolution of systemic Th2 sensitization (total IgE blood levels and specific IgE) at week 16 versus baseline. - Effect on the evolution of skin inflammation on skin biopsies at week 16 versus baseline. - Effect on the evolution of protease activity on skin biopsies at week 16 versus baseline. - Effect on the evolution of microbiome analysis at week 16 versus baseline. - Effect on the evolution of the TEWL (transepidermal water loss), at week 16 versus baseline. - To assess the safety during the study period. ;Primary end point(s): The severity of the disease will be evaluated by measuring the evolution at week 16 vs. baseline of the Netherton Area Severity Assessment score (NASA). ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Day 0, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 28.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): - Clinical efficacy - Bacterial or viral skin infections - Quantity of dermocorticosteroids - QOL : will be evaluated using the DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index (33)) and the IQoL-32 (specific ichthyosis QOL score (34)). - Systemic Th2 sensitization - Skin inflammation - Protease activity - Microbiome qualitative and quantitative analysis - TEWL: will be assessed using a Tewameter - Safety of dupilumab;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Day 0, Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 28.

Countries

France

Contacts

Public ContactALGANS

CHU de Toulouse

algans.n@chu-toulouse.fr+330561777204

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026