Skip to content

What is the best moment for performing an HSG in women with a unfulfilled childwish?

Tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG in subfertile women: Is early flushing effective and cost-effective as compared to delayed flushing? - H2Oil-timing study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2018-004153-24-NL
Enrollment
554
Registered
2019-07-30
Start date
2019-07-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The research population consists of infertile women aged between 18 and 39 years of age, who have a spontaneous menstrual cycle and with a perceived low risk for tubal pathology, undergoing fertility work-up

Interventions

Trade Name: Lipiodol Product Name: Lipiodol Ultrafluid Pharmaceutical Form: Injection

Sponsors

Amsterdam UMC - location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria: - Women between 18-39 years of age - Spontaneous menstrual cycle - Perceived low risk for tubal pathology - Undergoing fertility work-up Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 554 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Women with known endocrine disorders (e.g. the polycystic ovary syndrome, diabetes, hyperthyroidism and hyperprolactinemia. Except for well managed hypothyroidism with TSH between 0.3 and 2.5mIU/l) - Ovulation disorders defined as less than eight menstrual cycles per year - Iodine allergy - Male subfertility defined as a post-wash total motile sperm count < 1 x10^6 spermatozoa/ml - Not willing or able to sign the consent form

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The aim of this study is to determine whether direct tubal flushing with oil-based contrast at HSG incorporated in the fertility work-up results in 10% more ongoing pregnancies and a shorter time to pregnancy, which will therefore be cost-effective compared to delayed tubal flushing 6 months after fertility work-up is completed in women at low risk for tubal pathology.;Secondary Objective: Treatment outcome parameters: - Live birth - Clinical pregnancy - Ongoing pregnancy - Miscarriage - Ectopic pregnancy - Multiple pregnancy - Complications following HSG (infection, intravastion) - Pregnancy outcomes (f.e. birth weight) - Pregnancy complications - Stillbirth - Thyroid function of the woman (before and 1 month after HSG) - Neonatal outcomes - Additional fertility treatments (Intra-uterine insemination, IVF, IVF/ICSI) - Thyroid function of neonate (determined by heelprick) - Level of anxiety and pain during HSG Cost-effectiveness: - Direct and indirect costs of treatment within 12 months after randomization;Primary end point(s): The primary outcome is time to live birth, calculated from positive pregnancy test and within 12 months after randomization.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: 12 months after randomization, unless a patient is pregnant within the 12 months follow-up, then she will be followed untill the end of the pregnancy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): - Live birth - Clinical pregnancy - Ongoing pregnancy - Miscarriage - Ectopic pregnancy - Multiple pregnancy - Complications following HSG (infection, intravastion) - Pregnancy outcomes (f.e. birth weight) - Pregnancy complications - Stillbirth - Thyroid function of the woman (before and 1 month after HSG) - Neonatal outcomes - Additional fertility treatments (Intra-uterine insemination, IVF, IVF/ICSI) - Costs within 12 months after randomization - Thyroid function of neonate (determined by heelprick) - Level of anxiety and pain during HSG;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: T0: Time of randomization T1: Six months after randomization T2: Twelve months after randomization, unless a patient is pregnant within the 12 months follow-up, then she will be followed untill the end of the pregnancy.

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public Contactdr. V. Mijatovic

Amsterdam UMC - location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

mijatovic@vumc.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 9, 2026