Skip to content

Trial of URsodeoxycholic acid versus RIFampicin in severe early onset Intrahepatic Cholestasis of pregnancy: the TURRIFIC study

A randomised trial of URsodeoxycholic acid versus RIFampicin in severe early onset Intrahepatic Cholestasis of pregnancy: the TURRIFIC study, comparing their effectiveness in the reduction of pruritus. - TURRIFIC Protocol Version 8

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2018-004011-44-GB
Enrollment
108
Registered
2020-05-28
Start date
2020-08-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy (ICP) is an serious liver condition in pregnancy. The main symptom of this is itching. Ursodeoxycholic acid is routinely used to treat cholestasis but is not effective in reducing itch in all people who take it. Rifampcin has been used to reduce itch in people with Primary Biliary Cholangitis. This study will randomly allocate women with severe early onset ICP to receive either Ursodeoxycholic Acid, or the "Investigational drug" Rifampicin. MedDRA versi

Interventions

Product Name: Rifampicin Pharmaceutical Form: Film-coated tablet INN or Proposed INN: Rifampicin CAS Number: 13292-46-1 Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: equal Concentration numb

Sponsors

The University Of Adelaide
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women will be considered eligible for inclusion into the trial with the following criteria: • Severe ICP (defined as pruritus with raised total serum BA =40 µmol/L) confirmed • Viable pregnancy between 14+0 and 33+6 weeks gestation inclusive • No known lethal fetal anomaly • Singleton pregnancy • Obstetric care in a consultant-led unit • Aged 18 years or over • Written informed consent has been obtained Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: 0 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 108 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 0

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A potential participant who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: • A decision has already been made for delivery within the next 48 hours • There is allergy to any component of the UDCA or RIF tablets • The woman is taking other medication that has a significant interaction with rifampicin treatment • There is a multi-fetal gestation • There is laboratory-confirmed active hepatitis A or hepatitis B, or positive serology for hepatitis C • There is current pre-eclampsia (ISSHP criteria) • There is a known primary hepatic disorder, including a-1-antitrypsin deficiency and autoimmune hepatitis, including primary biliary cholangitis • The woman is on current medication causing deranged liver enzymes • The woman is unwilling for her baby to have standard Vitamin K administration at birth • The woman has previously participated in TURRIFIC

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare treatment with Rifampicin (RIF) with the standard treatment, Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for the reduction of itch, the main symptom of the condition.;Secondary Objective: 1. To compare the effect of RIF treatment with UDCA treatment on short-term outcomes for both mother and baby, including the length of the pregnancy and the rates of caesarean section and preterm birth 2. To compare the effect of RIF treatment with UDCA treatment on serum concentrations of: bile acids, transaminases (liver enzymes), and on metabolites such as serum autotaxin and progesterone sulphated metabolites, and urine glucuronidated 6a-hydroxylated BA. 3. To assess the effect of RIF and UDCA on the metabolome (the results of breakdown of nutrients, hormones and bodily processes) and the microbiome (bacteria in/on the body) 4. To assess the effect of treatment with RIF compared with UDCA on maternal and fetal outcomes analysed by bile acid transporter genotype.;Primary end point(s): Pruritus, defined as worst itch in the previous 24 hours, assessed on a patient-reported visual analogue scale.;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: At study entry, one week post randomisation, then monthly up to delivery, with optional assessments on a weekly basis after 28 weeks gestation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): 1. Outcomes for both mother and infant including the length of gestation and the incidence of caesarean section and preterm birth. 2. Serum concentrations of: bile acids, transaminases, and on metabolites such as serum autotaxin and progesterone sulphated metabolites, and urine glucuronidated 6a-hydroxylated BA. 3. Metabolome and the microbiome. 4. Maternal and fetal outcomes analysed by bile acid transporter genotype. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: These numbers correspond to the secondary outcomes listed in 23-2 above. 1. assessed at delivery 2. to be assessed at study entry, one week post randomisation, then on a monthly basis up to delivery. 3. to be assessed at study entry, one week post randomisation, then on a monthly basis up to delivery, one and two weeks post delivery 4. to be assessed once for mother using sample collected at study entry, once for baby using sample collected at birth.

Countries

Australia, Finland, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactChief Principal Investigator

The University of Adelaide

bill.hague@adelaide.edu.au61881617000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026