Skip to content

Effectiveness of antitussive, anticholinergic and honey therapy versus usual practice in adults with uncomplicated acute bronchitis [AB4T study]

Effectiveness of antitussive, anticholinergic and honey therapy versus usual practice in adults with uncomplicated acute bronchitis [AB4T study] - AB4T study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2018-002563-25-ES
Enrollment
668
Registered
2018-08-10
Start date
2018-11-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cough in the context of acute bronchitis MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: PT Classification code 10006451 Term: Bronchitis System Organ Class: 10021881 - Infections and infestations

Interventions

Product Name: Dextrometorfano Pharmaceutical Form: Tablet INN or Proposed INN: DEXTROMETHORPHAN HYDROBROMIDE Other descriptive name: dextrometorfano Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration t

Sponsors

IDIAP Jordi Gol
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients aged 18 years or older, who come to the primary care physician with cough of up to 3 weeks of evolution in the context of acute bronchitis and who agree to participate in the clinical trial. - Patients who score =4 in daytime and / or nighttime on the Likert scale of 6 points. Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 508 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 160

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Suspected pneumonia. - Patient with criteria for hospital referral - Pregnancy or lactation. - Basic respiratory disease: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, tuberculosis or bronchiectasis. - Associated significant comorbility: moderate-severe heart failure, dementia, acute myocardial infarction / recent stroke (<3 months), severe hepatic insufficiency, severe renal insufficiency. - Immunosuppression. - Active neoplasia - Terminal disease - History of intolerance or allergy to any of the study treatments. - Patients in whom, in the opinion of the researcher, treatment with dextromethorphan, ipratropium bromide or honey is contraindicated. - Institutionalized patients. - Difficulty making scheduled follow-up visits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary Objective: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of adding 3 symptomatic treatments to the usual practice compared to the usual clinical practice in: - The reduction of days until resolution of acute bronchitis - Reduction of days with moderate-severe diurnal cough - The reduction of days with moderate-severe nighttime cough - Duration in days of cough - The duration in days of severe symptoms - The duration in days of severe or moderate symptoms - According to the basal degree of bronchial hyperreactivity quantified by peak-flow - The use of antibiotics and different symptomatic treatments - The number of days of absenteeism - The number of times the patient returns to consult - The number of complications - Patient satisfaction Evaluate the adverse reactions in each of the test strategies;Main Objective: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of adding 3 symptomatic treatments (dextromethorphan, ipratropium bromide or honey) to normal practice in the reduction of days with moderate-severe cough compared with usual practice;Primary end point(s): Day reduction in the duration of moderate-severe cough;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Daily evaluation by the patient's diary, which is collected in the face-to-face visit on day 15 and, if necessary, on the 29th day.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Duration in days of: - symptomatology - moderate-severe diurnal cough - moderate-severe nighttime cough - cough - severe symptoms - severe or moderate symptoms Bronchial hyperreactivity degree difference Use of antibiotics and other symptomatic treatments Number of days of absenteeism Number of times the patient returns to consult Number of complications Degree of satisfaction Number of adverse reactions;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: The variables evaluated by reduction in days will be collected daily by the patient in the symptom diary, of 14 days and, if necessary, 28 days. The researcher will collect and review the diary in the face-to-face visits of the 15th and 29th. Difference degree bronchial hyperreactivity: day 15 Use of antibiotics and other symptomatic treatments: day 15 and day 29 Number of days of work absenteeism: day 15 Number of times the patient returns to consult: day 29 and call day 42 Number of complications: day 29 and call day 42 Degree of satisfaction: day 15 or day 29 Number of adverse reactions: day 15 and day 29

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Public ContactUnitat Estudis Medicament

IDIAP Jordi Gol

agarcia@idiapjgol.org34934824644

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026