Skip to content

Optimizing response to Li treatment through personalized evaluation of individuals with bipolar I disorder

Optimizing response to Li treatment through personalized evaluation of individuals with bipolar I disorder - RLINK

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2018-002263-26-NO
Enrollment
320
Registered
2018-12-06
Start date
2019-05-13
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult individuals with bipolar I disorders who initiate lithium treatment based on the decision of themselves and their clinician MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: PT Classification code 10057667 Term: Bipolar disorder System Organ Class: 10037175 - Psychiatric disorders

Interventions

Trade Name: Lithionit Pharmaceutical Form: Tablet

Sponsors

DRCI APHP
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Decision to prescribe Li as a prophylactic treatment based on clinicians' assessment 2. Confirmed diagnosis of BD1 according to DSM-5 criteria [based on the Mood section of the SCID] 3. Aged 18-70 years. 4. Able and willing to give written informed consent 5. Eligible for, and consents to blood sample for the purpose of the RLiNK study 6. Covered by a Social Security Insurance where applicable Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 320 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 0

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Trial of Lithium undertaken within the last 6 months 2 Lifetime history of mood disorder better explained by a DSM-5 definition for schizoaffective disorder [based on the relevant section of the SCID] 3 Pre-lithium screening suggest that Lithium initiation is contraindicated: 4 Participation in another research protocol that interferes with the evaluation of Lithium response (efficacy or tolerance) 5 Severe risk of self-harm at present, based on clinician's evaluation 6 Protected adult

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: The objective of this study is to identify the eligibility criteria for treatment with Li in BDI in terms of response, safety and tolerability Primary Objective: To evaluate the predictive values of the biomarkers collected during the first three months of Lithium treatment on long term Lithium response (2 years) define according the primary outcome measures ; Secondary Objective: To evaluate the prognostic values of the biomarkers collected during the first three months of Lithium treatment on long term Lithium response (2 years) define according the secondary outcome measures ; Primary end point(s): After all study participants have completed the follow-up period, the expert panel will reach a consensus on the classification of each participant into one of three categories: (i) good responders (GR), (ii) partial responders (PR), (iii) non-responders (NR). If no clinical followup data are available, the participant will be categorized as unclassifiable (UC). ; Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: After all study participants have completed the follow-up period, the expert panel will reach a consensus on the classification of each participant into one of three categories: (i) good responders (GR), (ii) partial responders (PR), (iii) non-responders (NR). If no clinical followup data are available, the participant will be categorized as unclassifiable (UC).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): There are several possible definitions of treatment response that employ different levels of precision. a) Response assessed retrospectively by estimating the total score b) Time dependent measures of outcome c) Continuous ratings of BD symptoms ; Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: The durations of the clinician-rated and self-questionnaires at each visit are detailed in Table 3 of the protocole - Definition of a Missing face to face visit: Planned appointment + 1month - Definition of a Missing telephone visit: Planned appointment + 1 week - In case of missing visit the information needed to inform the primary outcome (such as relapse, hospitalisation, suicide attempt, comorbidities…) will be collected retrospectively at the next visit.

Countries

Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactProject Manager

DRCI APHP

damien.vanhoye@aphp.frFranc144841793

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026