Skip to content

A research study to compare different doses of a new investigational medicinal product for treatment of certain patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Dose Finding and Comparison Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a High Dose of Eteplirsen, Preceded by an Open-Label Dose Escalation, in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy With Deletion Mutations Amenable to Exon 51 Skipping

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2018-001762-42-GB
Enrollment
122
Registered
2019-07-04
Start date
2019-09-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy MedDRA version: 20.0 Level: PT Classification code 10013801 Term: Duchenne muscular dystrophy System Organ Class: 10010331 - Congenital, familial and genetic disorders

Interventions

Sponsors

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: A patient must meet all of the following criteria to be eligible to participate in this study. 1. Be a male with an established clinical diagnosis of DMD and an out-of-frame deletion mutation of the DMD gene amenable to exon 51 skipping (for example, deletions of exons 45-50, 47-50, 48-50, 49-50, 50, 52, and 52-63). 2. Be aged 7 to 13 years, inclusive 3. Have achieved a mean 6MWT distance of =300 and =450 meters (without assistance) at both the Screening and Baseline visits for the double-blind part. 4. Have intact right and left biceps muscles (the preferred biopsy site) or an alternative upper arm muscle group that will allow for sufficiently sized (1 cm3) muscle biopsies to be obtained prior to and on treatment (for patients in the double-blind part of the study). 5. Have been on a stable dose or dose equivalent of oral corticosteroids for at least 12 weeks prior to randomization, and the dose is expected to remain constant (except for modifications to accommodate changes in weight and stress-related needs as per recently published guidelines throughout the study). 6. Have stable pulmonary function (forced vital capacity =50% of predicted and no requirement for nocturnal ventilation) that, in the Investigator’s opinion, is unlikely to decompensate significantly over the duration of the study. 7. If sexually active, agree to use a male condom during such activity for the entire duration of the study and for 90 days after the last dose. The sexual partner must also use a medically acceptable form of contraceptive (ie, female oral contraceptives) during this timeframe. Acceptable methods of contraception include combined (estrogen and progesterone containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, or transdermal); progesterone-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, or implantable); intrauterine device; intra-uterine hormone-releasing system; bilateral tubal occlusion; vasectomized partner; sexual abstinence; or condom in combination with either cap, diaphragm, or sponge with spermicide (double-barrier contraception). 8. Have (a) parent(s) or legal guardian(s) who is (are) able to understand and comply with all the study requirements. 9. Is willing to provide informed assent (if applicable) and has (a) parent(s) or legal guardian(s) who is (are) willing to provide informed consent for the patient to participate in the study. Are the trial subjects under 18? yes Number of subjects for this age range: 152 F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A patient who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from this study: 1. Use of any pharmacologic treatment (other than corticosteroids) within 12 weeks prior to randomization that may have an effect on muscle strength or function. Growth hormone for short stature and testosterone for delayed puberty are permitted if physician has documented the diagnosis and medical necessity of treatment and if the patient has been on a stable dose for at least 24 weeks prior to randomization. 2. Current or previous treatment with any other experimental pharmacologic treatment for DMD or any prior exposure to antisense oligonucleotide, gene therapy or gene editing; except the following: Ezutromid in the last 1 weeks prior to first dose. Drisapersen in the last 36 weeks prior to first dose 3. Major surgery within 3 months prior to randomization or planned surgery for any time during this study, except for allowed protocol-specified surgery, as applicable. 4. Presence of any significant neuromuscular or genetic disease other than DMD (eg, dwarfism). 5. Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) > 3 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) or serum bilirubin > ULN unexplained by Gilbert’s Syndrome. 6. Any known impairment of renal function (eg, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] = 60 mL/min as assessed by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI] equation), or dipstick protein result +2, or persistent and unexplained dipstick protein result +1 7. Platelet count < the lower limit of normal (LLN). 8. Presence of other clinically significant illness including significant cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, hematologic, immunologic, or behavioral disease or malignancy. 9. Has evidence of cardiomyopathy, as defined by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% on the screening ECHO or the Fridericia’s correction formula (QTcF) =450 milliseconds based on the screening ECGs. 10. Prior or ongoing medical condition that could, in the Investigator’s opinion, adversely affect the safety of the patient, make it unlikely that the course of treatment would be completed, or impair the assessment of study results. 11. Known hypersensitivity to eteplirsen or any excipients of eteplirsen. 12. Is, in the Investigator’s opinion, unable or unwilling to comply with the study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: Open-Label Dose Escalation Evaluate the safety and tolerability of weekly IV doses of 100 and 200 mg/kg of eteplirsen. Double-blind Dose Finding Part: Selection of a high dose (100 mg/kg vs 200 mg/kg) as compared with 30 mg/kg administered IV once weekly. Evaluate the PK, PD (exon skipping quantitation), safety and tolerability of doses higher than 30 mg/kg of eteplirsen, to select a single higher dose of eteplirsen for dose comparison Double-Blind Dose Comparison: Comparison of a selected high dose of eteplirsen with 30 mg/kg IV weekly. To investigate the effect of a selected high dose of eteplirsen (100 mg/kg or 200 mg/kg) as compared with 30 mg/kg, administered weekly IV, on motor function in ambulant Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients with confirmed deletion genotypes amenable to exon 51 skipping;Secondary Objective: Double-blind Dose Comparison: Comparison of a selected high dose of eteplirsen with 30 mg/kg IV weekly on: -Ambulatory performance -Pulmonary function -Dystrophin expression To evaluate safety and tolerability of a selected high dose as compared with 30 mg/kg of eteplirsen, administered weekly IV ;Primary end point(s): Open-Label Dose Escalation: Incidence of AEs, adverse events of special interest (AESIs) serious adverse events (SAEs), Safety laboratory assessments, ECGs and ECHO Double-Blind Dose Finding: Dystrophin expression in biopsied muscle tissue Plasma PK parameters of 30, 100, and 200 mg/kg of eteplirsen, administered IV weekly Incidence of AEs, AESIs and SAEs Abnormal changes from baseline or worsening of vitals or physical examination findings Safety laboratory assessments ECGs and ECHO Tissue concentration of eteplirsen from biopsied muscle tissue Dose Comparison Change from baseline at Week 144 in North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) total score;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Open-label Dose Escalation week 1- 8 safety and tolerability data will be assessed to determine if the if the

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Change from Baseline at Week 144 in o 6-minute walk test (6MWT) o 10 meter walk/run time o Timed 4 step stair ascend test o Time to rise from floor Annual decline rate in FVC % predicted Time to Loss of Ambulation (LOA) Change in skeletal muscle dystrophin expression by: o Western blot (quantitation) o IHC fiber intensity o Exon skipping quantitation by PCR Incidence of AEs Incidence of AESIs Incidence of SAEs Safety laboratory assessments ECGs ECHO;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Change from baseline at Week 144 Change from baseline at either Week 12, Week 24, or Week 48 6MWT, 10 meter walk/run timer and Time to rise from floor will be assesses on screening visit and week 12

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Russian Federation, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

Public ContactLiana Baker

PPD

Liana.Baker@ppdi.com+2155916631

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026