Skip to content

Study comparing pain relief between low-dose methoxyflurane and the usual treatment in patients with pain due to accidents in the emergency medical services in the Netherlands

Open randomized clinical trial to compare pain relief between low-dose methoxyflurane and standard of care for the treatment of patients with trauma pain in emergency medical services in the Netherlands. - Low-dose MEOF vs SoC for trauma pain in emergency medical services

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2018-001601-82-NL
Enrollment
300
Registered
2018-12-11
Start date
2019-07-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with moderate trauma pain due to extremity injuries for whom the emergency medical services have been called.

Interventions

Trade Name: Penthrox Pharmaceutical Form: Inhalation vapour, liquid Trade Name: paracetamol Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for infusion Trade Name: fentanyl Pharmaceutical Form: Solution for injectio

Sponsors

Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals B.V.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients should be = 18 years of age - Moderate pain (NRS0-10 =4 and =8) secondary to extremity injuries - Conscious patients with a stable circulation Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 300 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Hypersensitivity to MEOF or any fluorinated anaesthetic. - Malignant hyperthermia: patients with known or genetically susceptible to malignant hyperthermia or a history of severe adverse reactions in either patient or relatives. - Patients who have a history of showing signs of liver damage after previous MEOF use or halogenated hydrocarbon anaesthesia - Known clinically significant renal impairment - Known pregnant or likely to be pregnant women at the time of inclusion. - Clinically evident cardiovascular instability - Clinically evident respiratory depression - Patients taken any analgesic (excluding oral WHO-step 1 analgesics) for the trauma pain before inclusion - Altered level of consciousness due to any cause, including head injury, drugs or alcohol - Active alcohol or drug abuse and/or history of opioid abuse - Degenerative diseases, mental illness or other conditions that could affect ability of valuing pain intensity - Patients unable to understand the purpose of the study and perform self-assessments, following investigator’s criteria. - Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to randomization.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: t=0 (first “in study” pain (NRS) assessment on scene) to 3, 5 and 10 min ;Secondary Objective: Evaluating the analgesic effectiveness (proportion of patients with a clinically relevant reduction of the pain score), speed of onset of analgesia, ease of use, time on scene, transportation costs and safety.;Primary end point(s): Change in mean pain intensity (NRS) over 10 min: Change from baseline (t=0; first “in study” pain (NRS) assessment on scene) to 3, 5 and 10 min using Mixed-Effect Model Repeated Measure (MMRM). ;Main Objective: This study aims at evaluating efficacy (in terms of superiority to) of low-dose methoxyflurane versus standard of care in the treatment of acute pain due to extremity injuries in the emergency medical services in the Netherlands.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): Change in mean pain intensity (NRS) over 5 min Speed of action Proportion of patients with a clinically meaningful reduction in pain intensity score Satisfaction regarding convenience, treatment efficacy and adverse events Fulfilment of expectations Patients’Global Impression of Change Treatment costs of pain relief Safety;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: depending on the endpoint: Change in mean pain intensity (t=0 (first “in study” pain (NRS) assessment on scene) to 3 and 5 min Speed of action (t=0; first in study pain (NRS) assessment on scene, 3, 5 and 10 min pain (NRS) measurements) Proportion of patients with a clinically meaningful reduction in pain intensity score (t=0 first in study pain (NRS) assessment on scene) and t=10 min pain (NRS) measurements) other parameters will be measured once after 10 minutes, but before transfer to the Emergency Department

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Public ContactMedical Manager

RAV Brabant Midden West Noord

x.moors@erasmusmc.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026