Skip to content

Diagnostic, comparative and multicenter study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of Nasal Provocation Test in allergen immunotherapy treatments

Interest of Nasal Provocation Tests for Diagnosis of House Mites Allergic Rhinitis - NPT-MAR

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
EU CTR
Registry ID
EUCTR2018-000597-29-FR
Enrollment
85
Registered
2019-03-26
Start date
2021-06-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

mite allergenic rhinitis

Interventions

Trade Name: (IMP1) AllergoPharma - Provokations Testlösung 725 Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (5.000 SBE/ml) Product Name: Nasal provocation test – 725 Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus Pharmaceutical

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Patient over 18 years old, • Patient with persistent mild to severe or moderate to severe intermittent rhinitis according to ARIA criteria, suspicion of allergic rhinitis to dust mites, and a positive skin test for mites and / or a positive mite specific IgE assay • Patient having signed a free and informed consent Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 70 F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) yes F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 15

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Pregnant or breastfeeding women • Patients under guardianship or curatorship • Patients under legal protection • Patients not affiliated to a social security scheme • Contraindications to performing a RNPT o Active ENT or respiratory infections. o Allergy in acute phase. o History of anaphylaxis due to the allergen involved. o Unstabilized asthma and other obstructive pathologies. o Severe general illnesses in evolution. o Hypersensitivity to one of the components of the product o Simultaneous treatment with beta-blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, o Presence of an excessive degree of sensitization (e.g. history, excessive skin reactions), • Contraindications to immunotherapy: o Asthma (uncontrolled) o Active autoimmune diseases o Malignant tumors o Pregnancy (initiation of venereal disease) o AIDS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Main Objective: To compare the positive predictive value of the combination rapid nasal provocation test (TPNR) + skin tests (TC) + specific immunoglobulins E (IgEs) to the combination of TC + IgEs (strategy currently used in clinical practice) concerning the efficacy of treatment with Allergen immunotherapy (ITA) at 1 year, in patients with symptoms suggesting allergic rhinitis to house dust mites.;Secondary Objective: • To assess the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the TPNR + TC + IgEs combination concerning the efficacy of treatment with allergenic immunotherapy (ITA) at 1, 2 and 3 years • To Compare the positive predictive value of the combination of TPNR + TC + IgEs to the combination of TC and IgEs (strategy currently used in clinical practice) concerning the efficacy of treatment with allergenic immunotherapy (ITA) at 2 years and at 3 years • To study the concordance of the evaluation of the symptoms of rhinitis at the time of diagnosis and at 1, 2 and 3 years by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), by the CSMS (combined Symptom Medication score) and by the Lebel score. • Compare the effecticacy of ITA at 1, 2 and 3 years with the quality of life score (RQLQ questionnaire). ;Primary end point(s): The primary endpoint is negative predictive value, calculated with the efficacy of ITA at 1 year as the gold standard. It corresponds to the number of patients for whom treatment with an ITA will have been effective at 1 year, divided by the number of patients who have received an ITA. It will be calculated on the one hand for patients with TC and / or IgEs positive (control strategy), and on the other hand for patients with TC and / or IgEs positive and TPNR positive (strategy under study). ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: The end of the clinical trial

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary end point(s): • Effectiveness of ITA at 2 and 3 years, according to the same methods as for the primary endpoint. • Negative predictive value of the TC + IgEs + TPNR strategy for the efficacy of ITA at 1, 2 and 3 years, according to the same methods as for the primary endpoint. • Evaluation of the symptoms of allergic rhinitis using the CSMS score at 1, 2 and 3 years • Assessment of symptoms of allergic rhinitis using Lebel score at 1, 2 and 3 years • Evaluation of the specific quality of life at 1, 2 and 3 years, using the RQLQ questionnaire. ;Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: The end of the clinical trial

Countries

France

Contacts

Public ContactArpiné EL NAR

Plateforme d’appui à la recherche clinique

a.elnar@chr-metz-thionville.fr00330387557766

Outcome results

None listed

Source: EU CTR (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026